H2H data updated: 2026-08-08 02:15 UTC

Kimiko Date vs Conchita Martínez H2H: 6-2

Kimiko Date holds a 6–2 lead over Conchita Martínez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Kimiko Date leads 3–2 on hard courts and 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Kimiko Date won the 1996 San Diego semifinal 6-2 7-5.

JPN Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
6 2
8 main draw meetings
ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

WinnerScoreLoserMatch DataDateTournamentCategoryRoundSurface
Kimiko Date #9 6-2 7-5 Conchita Martínez #3 Match data Aug 24, 1996* San Diego WTA 500 SF Hard
Kimiko Date #13 5-7 7-6 6-3 Conchita Martínez #2 Match data Jul 3, 1996* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass
Conchita Martínez #2 6-0 6-4 Kimiko Date #8 Match data Mar 13, 1996* Indian Wells WTA 1000 SF Hard
Kimiko Date #10 0-6 6-2 6-3 Conchita Martínez #4 Match data Feb 5, 1995* Tokyo WTA 1000 QF Carpet
Kimiko Date #10 2-6 6-4 7-6 Conchita Martínez #3 Match data Nov 14, 1994 Virginia Slims Championships WTA Finals QF Carpet
Kimiko Date #9 6-2 4-6 6-3 Conchita Martínez #4 Match data Jan 28, 1994* Australian Open Grand Slam QF Hard
Kimiko Date #13 6-3 6-0 Conchita Martínez #4 Match data Jan 15, 1994* Sydney WTA 500 QF Hard
Conchita Martínez #8 6-1 7-6 Kimiko Date #25 Match data Mar 6, 1992* Boca Raton WTA 1000 R16 Hard

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kimiko Date #1,191 #4 1,280 2,091 245 190 56.3% 0 1 0 3 4 8
Conchita Martínez #1,498 #2 3,180 2,262 676 279 70.8% 1 9 0 3 20 33

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kimiko Date Conchita Martínez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1988 14–6 70.0% #41 1,729 0 1
17 1989 35–9 79.5% #7 1,928 0 4
18 1989 6–5 54.5% #119 1,563 0 0 1990 38–10 79.2% #11 2,062 0 7
19 1990 10–7 58.8% #79 1,665 0 0 1991 36–12 75.0% #9 2,076 0 10
20 1991 12–11 52.2% #32 1,725 0 0 1992 47–17 73.4% #8 2,057 0 11
21 1992 27–14 65.9% #21 1,853 0 1 1993 66–13 83.5% #4 2,159 0 16
22 1993 25–11 69.4% #13 1,948 0 2 1994 51–14 78.5% #3 2,065 1 20
23 1994 32–12 72.7% #9 1,985 0 4 1995 57–10 85.1% #2 2,182 1 26
24 1995 39–12 76.5% #4 2,028 0 5 1996 47–17 73.4% #5 2,066 1 28
25 1996 34–14 70.8% #8 2,076 0 7 1997 37–19 66.1% #12 2,010 1 28
26 1998 38–16 70.4% #8 1,967 1 30
27 1999 38–22 63.3% #15 1,898 1 31
28 2000 49–20 71.0% #5 1,922 1 32
29 2001 19–13 59.4% #35 1,843 1 32
30 2002 26–24 52.0% #34 1,755 1 32
31 2003 29–21 58.0% #18 1,755 1 32
32 2004 20–17 54.1% #42 1,752 1 32
33 2005 29–19 60.4% #31 1,799 1 33
37 2008 0–1 0.0% #189 2,048 0 7
38 2009 6–11 35.3% #69 1,845 0 8
39 2010 19–18 51.4% #51 1,823 0 8
40 2011 7–24 22.6% #87 1,570 0 8
41 2012 2–14 12.5% #99 1,456 0 8
42 2013 12–15 44.4% #75 1,576 0 8
43 2014 11–14 44.0% #90 1,598 0 8
44 2015 3–6 33.3% #182 1,574 0 8
46 2017 0–1 0.0% #1191 1,564 0 8