H2H data updated: 2026-09-23 00:00 UTC

Kimiko Date vs Federica Bonsignori H2H: 1-0

Kimiko Date holds a 1–0 lead over Federica Bonsignori in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kimiko Date leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kimiko Date won the 1990 Brisbane International round of 64 6-4 2-6 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kimiko Date
JPN Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Federica Bonsignori
ITA Age 58

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kimiko Date #119 6-4 2-6 7-5 Federica Bonsignori #143 Match data Jan 3, 1990* R64 Brisbane International Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kimiko Date #1,191 #4 1,280 2,092 245 190 56.3% 0 1 0 2 5 8
Federica Bonsignori #813 #28 30 1,709 75 112 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kimiko Date Federica Bonsignori
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1984 1–5 16.7% #144 1,481 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1985 6–7 46.2% #142 1,498 0 0
18 1989 6–5 54.5% #119 1,563 0 0 1986 6–6 50.0% #122 1,522 0 0
19 1990 10–7 58.8% #79 1,665 0 0 1987 11–14 44.0% #90 1,567 0 0
20 1991 12–11 52.2% #32 1,724 0 0 1988 8–16 33.3% #101 1,500 0 0
21 1992 27–14 65.9% #21 1,853 0 1 1989 4–10 28.6% #143 1,463 0 0
22 1993 25–11 69.4% #13 1,947 0 2 1990 10–8 55.6% #77 1,574 0 1
23 1994 32–12 72.7% #9 1,985 0 4 1991 12–13 48.0% #50 1,597 0 1
24 1995 39–12 76.5% #4 2,029 0 5 1992 11–14 44.0% #64 1,639 0 1
25 1996 34–14 70.8% #8 2,077 0 7 1993 5–13 27.8% #114 1,562 0 1
26 — — — — — — — 1994 1–5 16.7% #211 1,529 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 1995 0–1 0.0% #232 1,516 0 1
37 2008 0–1 0.0% #189 2,048 0 7 — — — — — — —
38 2009 6–11 35.3% #69 1,845 0 8 — — — — — — —
39 2010 19–18 51.4% #51 1,823 0 8 — — — — — — —
40 2011 7–24 22.6% #87 1,570 0 8 — — — — — — —
41 2012 2–14 12.5% #99 1,456 0 8 — — — — — — —
42 2013 12–15 44.4% #75 1,576 0 8 — — — — — — —
43 2014 11–14 44.0% #90 1,597 0 8 — — — — — — —
44 2015 3–6 33.3% #182 1,573 0 8 — — — — — — —
46 2017 0–1 0.0% #1191 1,564 0 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kimiko Date Federica Bonsignori
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — —
18 1989 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1986 — — — — 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1990 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 2 2 4 50.0% 9 11 20 45.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1991 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1988 1 2 3 33.3% 7 13 20 35.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 1992 15 6 21 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1989 1 4 5 20.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — —
22 1993 18 6 24 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 1990 0 4 4 0.0% 10 4 14 71.4% — — — — — — — —
23 1994 26 5 31 83.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1991 — — — — 12 12 24 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 1995 16 6 22 72.7% 11 3 14 78.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 6 1 7 85.7% 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 11 12 23 47.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 1996 25 8 33 75.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1993 0 3 3 0.0% 5 10 15 33.3% — — — — — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
37 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2009 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2010 17 15 32 53.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2011 4 16 20 20.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 2012 2 11 13 15.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 2013 10 12 22 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 2014 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
44 2015 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
46 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 170 127 297 57.2% 24 27 51 47.1% 31 24 55 56.4% 20 12 32 62.5% — 4 18 22 18.2% 68 87 155 43.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kimiko Date Federica Bonsignori
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1482 97.6 — — — — — +52 — 23.1% -2.23 0–1 — — +0.02
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1499 111.1 — — — — — +15 — 48.3% +0.14 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.80
18 1989 1563 118.2 — — — — -9 — +53 48.0% +0.24 3–0 (100%) 1–1 — +1.20 1986 1523 112.0 — — — — — +11 — 53.8% +0.62 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +1.77
19 1990 1665 128.2 — — — — -15 — — 57.1% +0.40 1–0 3–2 (60%) — -0.03 1987 1568 117.6 — — — — -20 +19 — 42.4% -0.47 6–3 (67%) 1–3 (25%) 104.2 +0.64
20 1991 1725 132.7 — — — — -22 — -81 52.7% +0.15 4–5 (44%) 3–1 (75%) 100.6 +0.73 1988 1500 111.7 — — — — +26 +9 — 36.8% -1.18 4–5 (44%) 3–3 (50%) 99.7 +0.56
21 1992 1854 155.6 — — — — +53 -237 -209 60.9% +0.92 8–2 (80%) 1–5 (17%) 104.6 -0.72 1989 1464 102.7 — — — — +19 +47 — 34.4% -0.91 1–3 (25%) 3–2 (60%) 99.2 +1.62
22 1993 1948 158.1 — — — — +75 -344 — 62.8% +1.00 7–1 (88%) 4–3 (57%) 105.3 -0.46 1990 1575 111.2 — — — — -136 +82 — 52.2% -0.04 6–4 (60%) 3–2 (60%) 103.6 +1.14
23 1994 1985 161.2 — — — — +87 -347 -333 67.0% +1.34 10–7 (59%) 3–1 (75%) 99.4 -0.33 1991 1598 122.9 — — — — — +46 — 46.3% -0.33 3–3 (50%) 1–5 (17%) 95.8 +0.57
24 1995 2030 160.2 — — — — +41 -192 -291 71.6% +1.43 11–5 (69%) 6–1 (86%) 104.6 -2.22 1992 1639 119.7 — — — — — +61 — 47.4% -0.44 2–5 (29%) 1–1 — +0.04
25 1996 2077 165.2 — — — — +20 -248 -187 65.8% +1.32 11–9 (55%) 1–5 (17%) 97.0 -0.42 1993 1563 114.5 — — — — -162 +44 — 32.6% -1.42 3–4 (43%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.45
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1530 108.9 — — — — — +57 — 23.1% -1.77 0–1 — — -0.17
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1517 97.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.08
37 2008 2049 101.3 +0.44 -0.26 0.663 40.6% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2009 1845 123.3 -0.97 +0.28 0.931 48.6% +25 — — 44.4% -0.38 3–8 (27%) 2–3 (40%) 87.7 -0.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2010 1823 145.4 -0.25 +1.83 0.998 49.9% +18 -46 — 51.8% -0.11 11–8 (58%) 9–2 (82%) 107.5 -3.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2011 1571 117.6 -2.22 +0.23 0.876 46.9% +27 +117 +226 27.3% -1.21 0–4 (0%) 3–10 (23%) 88.8 -2.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 2012 1457 113.8 -2.85 -1.69 0.875 47.1% +33 — — 20.0% -1.63 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 2013 1576 135.2 -1.65 +2.04 0.997 50.0% +7 — +183 46.4% +0.04 2–4 (33%) 0–7 (0%) 93.6 -0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 2014 1597 125.2 -1.57 -0.21 0.942 48.7% -18 — +178 50.8% -0.15 5–8 (38%) 5–4 (56%) 97.7 -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
44 2015 1574 113.0 -2.60 -0.62 0.817 46.3% -2 — — 35.0% -0.65 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
46 2017 1564 90.3 +0.60 +0.07 0.246 20.3% — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2093 154.4 -1.51 +0.62 0.928 48.3% +30 -185 -61 55.2% +0.45 77–65 (54%) 42–48 (47%) 95.3 -2.24 — 1709 118.7 — — — — -48 +39 — 42.0% -0.62 26–33 (44%) 16–22 (42%) 94.8 +3.54

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.