H2H data updated: 2026-08-15 02:40 UTC

Kimiko Date vs Jill Craybas H2H: 0-2

Jill Craybas holds a 2–0 lead over Kimiko Date in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jill Craybas leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jill Craybas won the 2009 Osaka round of 32 6-2 2-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kimiko Date
JPN Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Jill Craybas
USA Age 52 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

WinnerScoreLoserMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jill Craybas #83 6-2 2-6 6-4 Kimiko Date #96 Match data Oct 15, 2009* R32 Osaka WTA 250 Hard
Jill Craybas #64 6-4 6-3 Kimiko Date #186 Match data Jan 8, 2009* R32 Auckland WTA 250 Hard

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kimiko Date #1,191 #4 1,280 2,091 245 190 56.3% 0 1 0 3 4 8
Jill Craybas #336 #39 974 1,693 161 257 38.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kimiko Date Jill Craybas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1989 6–5 54.5% #119 1,563 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1990 10–7 58.8% #79 1,665 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1991 12–11 52.2% #32 1,725 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1992 27–14 65.9% #21 1,853 0 1 1996 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0
22 1993 25–11 69.4% #13 1,948 0 2 — — — — — — —
23 1994 32–12 72.7% #9 1,985 0 4 1998 0–1 0.0% #154 1,473 0 0
24 1995 39–12 76.5% #4 2,028 0 5 1999 0–4 0.0% #175 1,445 0 0
25 1996 34–14 70.8% #8 2,076 0 7 2000 1–2 33.3% #145 1,449 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 2001 8–17 32.0% #98 1,479 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2002 19–15 55.9% #57 1,652 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 2003 16–22 42.1% #99 1,568 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2004 12–21 36.4% #59 1,496 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2005 19–23 45.2% #48 1,613 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2006 18–25 41.9% #70 1,568 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2007 12–27 30.8% #79 1,472 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2008 22–26 45.8% #64 1,571 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 2009 12–21 36.4% #76 1,590 0 1
35 — — — — — — — 2010 12–23 34.3% #98 1,546 0 1
36 — — — — — — — 2011 6–20 23.1% #150 1,442 0 1
37 2008 0–1 0.0% #189 2,048 0 7 2012 3–7 30.0% #189 1,448 0 1
38 2009 6–11 35.3% #69 1,845 0 8 2013 1–2 33.3% #336 1,451 0 1
39 2010 19–18 51.4% #51 1,823 0 8 — — — — — — —
40 2011 7–24 22.6% #87 1,570 0 8 — — — — — — —
41 2012 2–14 12.5% #99 1,456 0 8 — — — — — — —
42 2013 12–15 44.4% #75 1,576 0 8 — — — — — — —
43 2014 11–14 44.0% #90 1,598 0 8 — — — — — — —
44 2015 3–6 33.3% #182 1,574 0 8 — — — — — — —
46 2017 0–1 0.0% #1191 1,564 0 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kimiko Date Jill Craybas
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1989 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1991 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1992 15 6 21 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1993 18 6 24 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1994 26 5 31 83.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1995 16 6 22 72.7% 11 3 14 78.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 6 1 7 85.7% 1999 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1996 25 8 33 75.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 2000 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 12 8 20 60.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 11 14 25 44.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 10 14 24 41.7% 0 5 5 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 10 15 25 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 13 15 28 46.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 9 17 26 34.6% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 14 15 29 48.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 9 12 21 42.9% 2 8 10 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 6 13 19 31.6% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 3 11 14 21.4% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
37 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
38 2009 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2013 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
39 2010 17 15 32 53.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2011 4 16 20 20.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 2012 2 11 13 15.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 2013 10 12 22 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 2014 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
44 2015 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
46 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 170 127 297 57.2% 24 27 51 47.1% 31 24 55 56.4% 20 12 32 62.5% — 104 152 256 40.6% 44 77 121 36.4% 12 22 34 35.3% 1 6 7 14.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 149/164 of Kimiko Date's and 212/350 of Jill Craybas's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Kimiko Date Jill Craybas
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 3/38 0.3 3.0 64.3% 52.0% 37.3% 34.9% 52.8% 47.1% 35.2%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 6/33 0.2 2.2 63.7% 60.8% 46.8% 53.4% 42.0% 55.7% 45.5%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 7/42 0.6 3.1 66.5% 54.8% 41.1% 49.7% 52.7% 50.1% 46.6%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 24/43 1.1 3.0 63.8% 58.5% 43.9% 52.8% 54.0% 53.3% 45.2%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 29/39 1.1 2.6 62.4% 54.5% 45.8% 48.4% 50.3% 51.3% 42.8%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 40/48 0.8 3.3 66.3% 58.5% 43.8% 50.7% 47.2% 53.7% 46.8%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 31/33 0.5 3.7 62.0% 58.5% 41.9% 45.7% 48.8% 52.3% 43.6%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 34/35 1.1 2.9 64.2% 58.1% 40.4% 43.9% 50.1% 52.0% 41.2%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 25/26 0.7 2.8 62.7% 56.2% 40.4% 52.8% 38.8% 50.4% 38.8%
37 2008 1/1 0.0 2.0 59.2% 51.7% 35.0% 44.4% 33.3% 44.9% 36.5% 2012 10/10 0.5 3.1 65.4% 54.2% 35.3% 44.1% 56.6% 47.6% 41.2%
38 2009 13/17 0.8 4.3 67.1% 59.1% 41.4% 54.1% 46.2% 53.0% 43.8% 2013 3/3 0.7 3.3 63.5% 49.9% 34.0% 44.0% 42.9% 44.5% 41.0%
39 2010 33/37 0.9 3.4 63.8% 59.3% 47.5% 49.2% 52.3% 54.8% 45.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
40 2011 30/31 0.6 3.6 63.3% 56.5% 42.0% 46.1% 41.4% 51.2% 42.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
41 2012 15/16 0.8 3.3 61.9% 58.2% 43.5% 48.8% 55.9% 52.0% 42.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
42 2013 27/27 0.7 2.1 69.1% 57.3% 44.5% 47.7% 51.0% 53.3% 46.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
43 2014 24/25 1.1 3.4 67.2% 57.3% 48.2% 43.4% 49.8% 54.3% 43.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
44 2015 5/9 1.0 5.4 65.2% 53.7% 48.1% 42.2% 47.4% 51.7% 39.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
46 2017 1/1 0.0 3.0 51.5% 23.5% 18.8% 0.0% 0.0% 21.2% 19.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 149/435 0.8 3.3 65.2% 57.4% 44.8% 47.1% 48.6% 52.9% 43.7% — 212/418 0.8 3.1 63.9% 57.2% 42.2% 48.5% 48.6% 51.9% 43.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kimiko Date Jill Craybas
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule
18 1989 1563 118.2 — — — — -8 — +54 48.0% +0.24 3–0 (100%) 1–1 +1.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 1665 128.3 — — — — -15 — — 57.1% +0.40 1–0 3–2 (60%) +0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1991 1725 132.7 — — — — -21 — -80 52.7% +0.15 4–5 (44%) 3–1 (75%) -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1992 1854 155.6 — — — — +53 -237 -208 60.9% +0.92 8–2 (80%) 1–5 (17%) -0.85 1996 1488 98.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — +0.11
22 1993 1948 158.1 — — — — +75 -344 — 62.8% +1.00 7–1 (88%) 4–3 (57%) -0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1994 1985 161.2 — — — — +87 -347 -333 67.0% +1.34 10–7 (59%) 3–1 (75%) -1.12 1998 1473 98.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — +0.19
24 1995 2029 160.2 — — — — +41 -191 -290 71.6% +1.43 11–5 (69%) 6–1 (86%) -1.54 1999 1445 107.1 — — — — +24 — — 0.0% -2.75 — 0–2 -0.09
25 1996 2077 165.2 — — — — +20 -248 -187 65.8% +1.32 11–9 (55%) 1–5 (17%) -2.14 2000 1450 103.4 — — — — +23 — — 42.9% -1.00 0–1 — -0.03
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1479 110.7 — — — — +12 -6 — 36.2% -0.76 3–5 (38%) 1–4 (20%) +0.17
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1653 112.4 — — — — -22 -155 -43 47.4% -0.45 10–4 (71%) 3–1 (75%) +0.44
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1568 113.2 -2.11 -2.34 0.665 41.6% +3 -51 +44 41.7% -0.71 5–7 (42%) 6–4 (60%) +0.93
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1497 110.5 +0.38 -0.09 1.027 50.9% +36 -68 +113 36.4% -0.95 7–6 (54%) 5–6 (45%) +1.60
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1613 122.1 -2.41 +0.28 0.934 48.6% -42 -142 +91 47.6% -0.21 8–11 (42%) 3–4 (43%) +0.29
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1568 125.6 -2.28 +0.59 0.968 49.4% +23 -84 +99 43.4% -0.28 6–9 (40%) 3–4 (43%) +0.24
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1473 114.0 -3.51 -1.24 0.880 47.3% +41 -3 +116 36.0% -1.19 3–8 (27%) 4–5 (44%) -0.59
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1571 125.0 -1.47 +1.80 1.013 50.2% +18 -32 — 47.7% 0.00 4–7 (36%) 7–8 (47%) +1.12
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1591 120.2 -2.51 -0.54 0.914 48.2% +29 -121 — 39.5% -0.76 4–6 (40%) 2–3 (40%) -1.07
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1546 110.5 -3.17 -1.80 0.858 46.7% +33 -58 -16 34.6% -1.23 5–5 (50%) 4–0 (100%) +0.09
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1442 107.4 -4.00 -4.02 0.783 44.8% +81 0 — 30.0% -1.53 2–6 (25%) 0–1 +0.20
37 2008 2048 101.3 +0.44 -0.26 0.663 40.6% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — -0.03 2012 1449 101.1 -4.12 -1.62 0.786 44.7% +63 +2 — 38.1% -1.71 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) +0.01
38 2009 1845 123.3 -0.97 +0.28 0.931 48.6% +24 — — 44.4% -0.38 3–8 (27%) 2–3 (40%) -0.94 2013 1451 96.4 -3.73 -1.77 0.738 42.8% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — +0.02
39 2010 1823 145.4 -0.25 +1.83 0.998 49.9% +18 -46 — 51.8% -0.11 11–8 (58%) 9–2 (82%) -3.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2011 1571 117.6 -2.22 +0.23 0.876 46.9% +27 +117 +226 27.3% -1.21 0–4 (0%) 3–10 (23%) -2.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 2012 1457 113.8 -2.85 -1.69 0.875 47.1% +33 — — 20.0% -1.63 0–3 (0%) 0–1 +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 2013 1576 135.2 -1.65 +2.04 0.997 50.0% +7 — +183 46.4% +0.04 2–4 (33%) 0–7 (0%) -0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 2014 1598 125.3 -1.57 -0.21 0.942 48.7% -18 — +176 50.8% -0.15 5–8 (38%) 5–4 (56%) +0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
44 2015 1574 112.8 -2.60 -0.62 0.817 46.3% -2 — — 35.0% -0.65 1–1 1–2 (33%) +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
46 2017 1565 90.3 +0.34 -0.32 0.246 20.3% — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2091 154.4 -1.51 +0.62 0.928 48.3% +30 -185 -61 55.2% +0.45 77–65 (54%) 42–48 (47%) -2.80 — 1694 119.3 -2.71 -0.73 0.898 47.7% +18 -60 +55 40.2% -0.73 58–79 (42%) 41–43 (49%) +0.87

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.