H2H data updated: 2026-08-08 02:15 UTC

Kimiko Date vs Jo Durie H2H: 2-0

Kimiko Date holds a 2–0 lead over Jo Durie in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kimiko Date leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kimiko Date won the 1993 Eastbourne third round W/O.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kimiko Date
JPN Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Jo Durie
GBR Age 66 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

WinnerScoreLoserMatch DataDateTournamentCategoryRoundSurface
Kimiko Date #21 (w/o) Jo Durie #96 Match data Jun 17, 1993* Eastbourne WTA 250 R32 Grass
Kimiko Date #112 6-4 6-1 Jo Durie #160 Match data Aug 17, 1991* Manhattan Beach WTA 250 QF Hard

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kimiko Date #1,191 #4 1,280 2,091 245 190 56.3% 0 1 0 3 4 8
Jo Durie #302 #5 31 2,102 314 264 54.3% 0 0 0 1 8 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kimiko Date Jo Durie
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1975 1–1 50.0% — 1,498 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1976 5–6 45.5% — 1,503 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1977 11–7 61.1% — 1,602 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1978 18–10 64.3% — 1,618 0 1
18 1989 6–5 54.5% #119 1,563 0 0 1979 15–8 65.2% — 1,715 0 3
19 1990 10–7 58.8% #79 1,665 0 0 1980 21–14 60.0% — 1,734 0 4
20 1991 12–11 52.2% #32 1,725 0 0 1981 30–14 68.2% — 1,860 0 7
21 1992 27–14 65.9% #21 1,853 0 1 1982 25–20 55.6% — 1,842 0 7
22 1993 25–11 69.4% #13 1,948 0 2 1983 47–18 72.3% #6 2,096 0 9
23 1994 32–12 72.7% #9 1,985 0 4 1984 16–15 51.6% #24 1,891 0 9
24 1995 39–12 76.5% #4 2,028 0 5 1985 17–19 47.2% #26 1,801 0 9
25 1996 34–14 70.8% #8 2,076 0 7 1986 24–17 58.5% #24 1,842 0 9
26 — — — — — — — 1987 10–17 37.0% #73 1,742 0 9
27 — — — — — — — 1988 19–19 50.0% #60 1,703 0 9
28 — — — — — — — 1989 8–13 38.1% #117 1,622 0 9
29 — — — — — — — 1990 13–13 50.0% #64 1,674 0 9
30 — — — — — — — 1991 15–18 45.5% #62 1,709 0 9
31 — — — — — — — 1992 13–16 44.8% #59 1,688 0 9
32 — — — — — — — 1993 4–12 25.0% #192 1,563 0 9
33 — — — — — — — 1994 1–4 20.0% #348 1,555 0 9
34 — — — — — — — 1995 1–3 25.0% #292 1,548 0 9
37 2008 0–1 0.0% #189 2,048 0 7 — — — — — — —
38 2009 6–11 35.3% #69 1,845 0 8 — — — — — — —
39 2010 19–18 51.4% #51 1,823 0 8 — — — — — — —
40 2011 7–24 22.6% #87 1,570 0 8 — — — — — — —
41 2012 2–14 12.5% #99 1,456 0 8 — — — — — — —
42 2013 12–15 44.4% #75 1,576 0 8 — — — — — — —
43 2014 11–14 44.0% #90 1,598 0 8 — — — — — — —
44 2015 3–6 33.3% #182 1,574 0 8 — — — — — — —
46 2017 0–1 0.0% #1191 1,564 0 8 — — — — — — —