H2H data updated: 2026-09-23 00:00 UTC

Kimiko Date vs Karin Kschwendt H2H: 4-1

Kimiko Date holds a 4–1 lead over Karin Kschwendt in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Kimiko Date leads 3–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kimiko Date won the 1996 Japan Women's Open quarterfinal 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kimiko Date
JPN Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main-draw meetings
Karin Kschwendt
AUT Age 58 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kimiko Date #9 6-2 6-2 Karin Kschwendt #53 Match data Apr 20, 1996* QF Japan Women's Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Kimiko Date #7 6-2 6-2 Karin Kschwendt #126 Match data Mar 13, 1994* R64 Key Biscayne Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Kimiko Date #13 6-4 3-6 6-3 Karin Kschwendt #71 Match data Sep 24, 1993* R32 Tokyo Nichirei Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Kimiko Date #19 6-4 6-4 Karin Kschwendt #53 Match data May 26, 1993* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Karin Kschwendt #70 7-5 6-4 Kimiko Date #106 Match data Apr 11, 1991* R32 Tokyo Japan Open Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kimiko Date #1,191 #4 1,280 2,092 245 190 56.3% 0 1 0 2 5 8
Karin Kschwendt #507 #37 426 1,712 79 116 40.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kimiko Date Karin Kschwendt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1989 6–5 54.5% #119 1,563 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1990 10–7 58.8% #79 1,665 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1991 12–11 52.2% #32 1,724 0 0 1989 3–9 25.0% #178 1,476 0 0
21 1992 27–14 65.9% #21 1,853 0 1 1990 6–9 40.0% #116 1,499 0 0
22 1993 25–11 69.4% #13 1,947 0 2 1991 15–18 45.5% #88 1,569 0 0
23 1994 32–12 72.7% #9 1,985 0 4 1992 4–7 36.4% #77 1,574 0 0
24 1995 39–12 76.5% #4 2,029 0 5 1993 15–16 48.4% #81 1,598 0 0
25 1996 34–14 70.8% #8 2,077 0 7 1994 9–15 37.5% #99 1,610 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 1995 10–13 43.5% #85 1,605 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 1996 15–14 51.7% #53 1,658 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 1997 1–12 7.7% #172 1,536 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 1998 1–2 33.3% #139 1,534 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2000 0–1 0.0% #413 1,516 0 0
37 2008 0–1 0.0% #189 2,048 0 7 — — — — — — —
38 2009 6–11 35.3% #69 1,845 0 8 — — — — — — —
39 2010 19–18 51.4% #51 1,823 0 8 — — — — — — —
40 2011 7–24 22.6% #87 1,570 0 8 — — — — — — —
41 2012 2–14 12.5% #99 1,456 0 8 — — — — — — —
42 2013 12–15 44.4% #75 1,576 0 8 — — — — — — —
43 2014 11–14 44.0% #90 1,597 0 8 — — — — — — —
44 2015 3–6 33.3% #182 1,573 0 8 — — — — — — —
46 2017 0–1 0.0% #1191 1,564 0 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kimiko Date Karin Kschwendt
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1989 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1991 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1989 0 3 3 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1992 15 6 21 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1990 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1993 18 6 24 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 1991 12 10 22 54.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
23 1994 26 5 31 83.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1992 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 1995 16 6 22 72.7% 11 3 14 78.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 6 1 7 85.7% 1993 9 7 16 56.3% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 1996 25 8 33 75.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1994 5 10 15 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 5 7 12 41.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 10 6 16 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1 7 8 12.5% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2009 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2010 17 15 32 53.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2011 4 16 20 20.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 2012 2 11 13 15.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 2013 10 12 22 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 2014 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
44 2015 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
46 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 170 127 297 57.2% 24 27 51 47.1% 31 24 55 56.4% 20 12 32 62.5% — 43 55 98 43.9% 26 40 66 39.4% 4 8 12 33.3% 6 13 19 31.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kimiko Date Karin Kschwendt
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1989 1563 118.2 — — — — -9 — +53 48.0% +0.24 3–0 (100%) 1–1 — +1.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 1665 128.2 — — — — -15 — — 57.1% +0.40 1–0 3–2 (60%) — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1991 1725 132.7 — — — — -22 — -81 52.7% +0.15 4–5 (44%) 3–1 (75%) 100.6 +0.73 1989 1477 108.7 — — — — +1 +93 — 28.6% -1.21 2–2 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 99.0 +0.60
21 1992 1854 155.6 — — — — +53 -237 -209 60.9% +0.92 8–2 (80%) 1–5 (17%) 104.6 -0.72 1990 1500 116.8 — — — — -22 +27 +132 41.7% -0.22 3–3 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 100.3 +1.10
22 1993 1948 158.1 — — — — +75 -344 — 62.8% +1.00 7–1 (88%) 4–3 (57%) 105.3 -0.46 1991 1570 131.4 — — — — -8 -8 — 49.3% -0.11 4–7 (36%) 6–2 (75%) 100.2 -0.70
23 1994 1985 161.2 — — — — +87 -347 -333 67.0% +1.34 10–7 (59%) 3–1 (75%) 99.4 -0.33 1992 1575 122.9 — — — — — +34 — 41.7% -0.58 0–2 0–2 — +0.11
24 1995 2030 160.2 — — — — +41 -192 -291 71.6% +1.43 11–5 (69%) 6–1 (86%) 104.6 -2.22 1993 1599 127.8 — — — — +18 -14 — 52.8% +0.60 4–8 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 95.7 +1.30
25 1996 2077 165.2 — — — — +20 -248 -187 65.8% +1.32 11–9 (55%) 1–5 (17%) 97.0 -0.42 1994 1611 123.8 — — — — -13 +13 — 39.3% -1.07 4–4 (50%) 1–1 — -0.22
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1606 119.9 — — — — -36 +45 -50 41.7% -0.38 2–4 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.29
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1659 133.2 — — — — +16 -26 -78 47.7% -0.05 6–1 (86%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.27
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1536 106.7 — — — — +44 +39 — 17.2% -2.17 0–3 (0%) 0–2 — -0.89
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1534 104.9 — — — — — — — 37.5% -0.88 1–1 — — +0.24
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1516 95.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.14
37 2008 2049 101.3 +0.44 -0.26 0.663 40.6% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2009 1845 123.3 -0.97 +0.28 0.931 48.6% +25 — — 44.4% -0.38 3–8 (27%) 2–3 (40%) 87.7 -0.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2010 1823 145.4 -0.25 +1.83 0.998 49.9% +18 -46 — 51.8% -0.11 11–8 (58%) 9–2 (82%) 107.5 -3.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2011 1571 117.6 -2.22 +0.23 0.876 46.9% +27 +117 +226 27.3% -1.21 0–4 (0%) 3–10 (23%) 88.8 -2.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 2012 1457 113.8 -2.85 -1.69 0.875 47.1% +33 — — 20.0% -1.63 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 2013 1576 135.2 -1.65 +2.04 0.997 50.0% +7 — +183 46.4% +0.04 2–4 (33%) 0–7 (0%) 93.6 -0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 2014 1597 125.2 -1.57 -0.21 0.942 48.7% -18 — +178 50.8% -0.15 5–8 (38%) 5–4 (56%) 97.7 -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
44 2015 1574 113.0 -2.60 -0.62 0.817 46.3% -2 — — 35.0% -0.65 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
46 2017 1564 90.3 +0.60 +0.07 0.246 20.3% — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2093 154.4 -1.51 +0.62 0.928 48.3% +30 -185 -61 55.2% +0.45 77–65 (54%) 42–48 (47%) 95.3 -2.24 — 1713 130.2 — — — — +1 +22 +1 42.7% -0.41 26–35 (43%) 14–20 (41%) 95.1 +0.57

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.