H2H data updated: 2026-09-23 00:00 UTC

Kimiko Date vs Karina Habsudova H2H: 0-1

Karina Habsudova holds a 1–0 lead over Kimiko Date in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Karina Habsudova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Karina Habsudova won the 1996 Manhattan Beach quarterfinal 6-4 4-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kimiko Date
JPN Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Karina Habsudova
SVK Age 53 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Karina Habsudova #21 6-4 4-6 6-2 Kimiko Date #8 Match data Aug 17, 1996* QF Manhattan Beach Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kimiko Date #1,191 #4 1,280 2,092 245 190 56.3% 0 1 0 2 5 8
Karina Habsudova #792 #10 2,022 1,953 172 174 49.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kimiko Date Karina Habsudova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1990 2–1 66.7% #124 1,536 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1991 14–15 48.3% #54 1,671 0 0
18 1989 6–5 54.5% #119 1,563 0 0 1992 9–14 39.1% #66 1,663 0 0
19 1990 10–7 58.8% #79 1,665 0 0 1993 7–12 36.8% #113 1,627 0 0
20 1991 12–11 52.2% #32 1,724 0 0 1994 15–12 55.6% #31 1,795 0 0
21 1992 27–14 65.9% #21 1,853 0 1 1995 14–13 51.9% #56 1,732 0 0
22 1993 25–11 69.4% #13 1,947 0 2 1996 38–22 63.3% #11 1,858 0 0
23 1994 32–12 72.7% #9 1,985 0 4 1997 23–23 50.0% #29 1,755 0 0
24 1995 39–12 76.5% #4 2,029 0 5 1998 9–17 34.6% #70 1,685 0 0
25 1996 34–14 70.8% #8 2,077 0 7 1999 21–15 58.3% #49 1,762 0 1
26 — — — — — — — 2000 14–20 41.2% #85 1,672 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 2001 6–10 37.5% #123 1,620 0 1
37 2008 0–1 0.0% #189 2,048 0 7 — — — — — — —
38 2009 6–11 35.3% #69 1,845 0 8 — — — — — — —
39 2010 19–18 51.4% #51 1,823 0 8 — — — — — — —
40 2011 7–24 22.6% #87 1,570 0 8 — — — — — — —
41 2012 2–14 12.5% #99 1,456 0 8 — — — — — — —
42 2013 12–15 44.4% #75 1,576 0 8 — — — — — — —
43 2014 11–14 44.0% #90 1,597 0 8 — — — — — — —
44 2015 3–6 33.3% #182 1,573 0 8 — — — — — — —
46 2017 0–1 0.0% #1191 1,564 0 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kimiko Date Karina Habsudova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 10 9 19 52.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
18 1989 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1992 4 7 11 36.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
19 1990 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 4 8 12 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1991 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1994 7 5 12 58.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1992 15 6 21 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1995 7 6 13 53.8% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1993 18 6 24 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 1996 18 9 27 66.7% 15 5 20 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 7 12 41.7%
23 1994 26 5 31 83.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1997 7 8 15 46.7% 9 8 17 52.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
24 1995 16 6 22 72.7% 11 3 14 78.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 6 1 7 85.7% 1998 3 5 8 37.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
25 1996 25 8 33 75.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1999 8 6 14 57.1% 11 4 15 73.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 10 8 18 55.6% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 3 3 6 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
37 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2009 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2010 17 15 32 53.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2011 4 16 20 20.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 2012 2 11 13 15.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 2013 10 12 22 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 2014 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
44 2015 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
46 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 170 127 297 57.2% 24 27 51 47.1% 31 24 55 56.4% 20 12 32 62.5% — 81 74 155 52.3% 63 51 114 55.3% 5 14 19 26.3% 23 35 58 39.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kimiko Date Karina Habsudova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1536 111.6 — — — — +46 — — 71.4% +0.71 0–1 — — +0.07
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1671 136.1 — — — — +23 -123 — 45.5% -0.32 6–2 (75%) 3–0 (100%) 109.6 -0.26
18 1989 1563 118.2 — — — — -9 — +53 48.0% +0.24 3–0 (100%) 1–1 — +1.20 1992 1663 140.8 — — — — +26 -85 — 41.5% -0.74 3–4 (43%) 3–0 (100%) 102.0 -1.32
19 1990 1665 128.2 — — — — -15 — — 57.1% +0.40 1–0 3–2 (60%) — -0.03 1993 1628 125.7 — — — — +14 -50 — 46.8% -0.19 1–8 (11%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.06
20 1991 1725 132.7 — — — — -22 — -81 52.7% +0.15 4–5 (44%) 3–1 (75%) 100.6 +0.73 1994 1796 152.2 — — — — -42 -99 — 54.2% +0.44 3–2 (60%) 0–3 (0%) 100.1 -1.38
21 1992 1854 155.6 — — — — +53 -237 -209 60.9% +0.92 8–2 (80%) 1–5 (17%) 104.6 -0.72 1995 1732 138.3 — — — — -6 -18 — 54.1% +0.26 2–5 (29%) 3–0 (100%) 98.2 -0.36
22 1993 1948 158.1 — — — — +75 -344 — 62.8% +1.00 7–1 (88%) 4–3 (57%) 105.3 -0.46 1996 1858 158.9 — — — — -42 +41 — 59.1% +0.66 12–7 (63%) 8–6 (57%) 106.8 -1.42
23 1994 1985 161.2 — — — — +87 -347 -333 67.0% +1.34 10–7 (59%) 3–1 (75%) 99.4 -0.33 1997 1756 144.1 — — — — +44 +38 -146 50.0% +0.07 7–7 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 98.1 +1.12
24 1995 2030 160.2 — — — — +41 -192 -291 71.6% +1.43 11–5 (69%) 6–1 (86%) 104.6 -2.22 1998 1685 132.5 — — — — +56 +60 — 40.0% -0.83 4–6 (40%) 3–0 (100%) 100.9 -2.04
25 1996 2077 165.2 — — — — +20 -248 -187 65.8% +1.32 11–9 (55%) 1–5 (17%) 97.0 -0.42 1999 1763 138.7 — — — — -39 +74 -212 56.6% +0.40 6–5 (55%) 3–2 (60%) 100.5 -1.31
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1673 123.7 — — — — +62 +17 — 42.7% -0.65 5–4 (56%) 5–5 (50%) 101.6 -0.77
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1621 107.3 — — — — +71 +3 — 37.8% -0.87 3–2 (60%) 2–2 (50%) 99.0 -0.16
37 2008 2049 101.3 +0.44 -0.26 0.663 40.6% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2009 1845 123.3 -0.97 +0.28 0.931 48.6% +25 — — 44.4% -0.38 3–8 (27%) 2–3 (40%) 87.7 -0.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2010 1823 145.4 -0.25 +1.83 0.998 49.9% +18 -46 — 51.8% -0.11 11–8 (58%) 9–2 (82%) 107.5 -3.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2011 1571 117.6 -2.22 +0.23 0.876 46.9% +27 +117 +226 27.3% -1.21 0–4 (0%) 3–10 (23%) 88.8 -2.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 2012 1457 113.8 -2.85 -1.69 0.875 47.1% +33 — — 20.0% -1.63 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 2013 1576 135.2 -1.65 +2.04 0.997 50.0% +7 — +183 46.4% +0.04 2–4 (33%) 0–7 (0%) 93.6 -0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 2014 1597 125.2 -1.57 -0.21 0.942 48.7% -18 — +178 50.8% -0.15 5–8 (38%) 5–4 (56%) 97.7 -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
44 2015 1574 113.0 -2.60 -0.62 0.817 46.3% -2 — — 35.0% -0.65 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
46 2017 1564 90.3 +0.60 +0.07 0.246 20.3% — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2093 154.4 -1.51 +0.62 0.928 48.3% +30 -185 -61 55.2% +0.45 77–65 (54%) 42–48 (47%) 95.3 -2.24 — 1953 148.2 — — — — +10 +8 -174 49.9% -0.03 52–53 (50%) 33–27 (55%) 103.8 -2.25

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.