H2H data updated: 2026-08-08 02:15 UTC

Kimiko Date vs Leila Meskhi H2H: 3-2

Kimiko Date holds a 3–2 lead over Leila Meskhi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Kimiko Date leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Leila Meskhi leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Kimiko Date won the 1994 US Open fourth round 6-2 6-7 7-5.

JPN Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
3 2
5 main draw meetings
GEO Age 58 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

WinnerScoreLoserMatch DataDateTournamentCategoryRoundSurface
Kimiko Date #6 6-2 6-7 7-5 Leila Meskhi #37 Match data Sep 6, 1994* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard
Kimiko Date #6 7-6 7-5 Leila Meskhi #31 Match data Aug 18, 1994* Toronto WTA 1000 R32 Hard
Leila Meskhi #23 6-2 6-3 Kimiko Date #24 Match data Aug 28, 1992* San Diego WTA 500 R16 Carpet
Leila Meskhi #15 4-6 6-3 6-2 Kimiko Date #34 Match data Jan 10, 1992* Sydney WTA 500 R16 Hard
Kimiko Date #112 6-4 6-1 Leila Meskhi #13 Match data Aug 15, 1991* Manhattan Beach WTA 250 R32 Hard

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kimiko Date #1,191 #4 1,280 2,091 245 190 56.3% 0 1 0 3 4 8
Leila Meskhi #903 #12 72 1,987 193 121 61.5% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kimiko Date Leila Meskhi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1989 6–5 54.5% #119 1,563 0 0
19 1990 10–7 58.8% #79 1,665 0 0 1987 11–7 61.1% #46 1,656 0 0
20 1991 12–11 52.2% #32 1,725 0 0 1988 18–18 50.0% #46 1,696 0 0
21 1992 27–14 65.9% #21 1,853 0 1 1989 21–14 60.0% #30 1,795 0 1
22 1993 25–11 69.4% #13 1,948 0 2 1990 38–14 73.1% #19 1,928 0 3
23 1994 32–12 72.7% #9 1,985 0 4 1991 30–14 68.2% #15 1,937 0 4
24 1995 39–12 76.5% #4 2,028 0 5 1992 26–16 61.9% #22 1,928 0 4
25 1996 34–14 70.8% #8 2,076 0 7 1993 22–17 56.4% #37 1,871 0 4
26 1994 22–15 59.5% #34 1,842 0 4
27 1995 5–2 71.4% #141 1,833 0 5
28 1996 0–4 0.0% #838 1,746 0 5
37 2008 0–1 0.0% #189 2,048 0 7
38 2009 6–11 35.3% #69 1,845 0 8
39 2010 19–18 51.4% #51 1,823 0 8
40 2011 7–24 22.6% #87 1,570 0 8
41 2012 2–14 12.5% #99 1,456 0 8
42 2013 12–15 44.4% #75 1,576 0 8
43 2014 11–14 44.0% #90 1,598 0 8
44 2015 3–6 33.3% #182 1,574 0 8
46 2017 0–1 0.0% #1191 1,564 0 8