H2H data updated: 2026-08-08 02:15 UTC

Kimiko Date vs Lindsay Davenport H2H: 3-4

Lindsay Davenport holds a 4–3 lead over Kimiko Date in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Lindsay Davenport leads 2–1 on clay and 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 1996 Roland Garros fourth round 3-6 6-4 8-6.

JPN Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
3 4
7 main draw meetings
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

WinnerScoreLoserMatch DataDateTournamentCategoryRoundSurface
Lindsay Davenport #12 3-6 6-4 8-6 Kimiko Date #9 Match data Jun 4, 1996* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay
Lindsay Davenport #12 6-2 4-6 7-5 Kimiko Date #5 Match data Jan 13, 1996* Sydney WTA 500 SF Hard
Kimiko Date #9 6-4 6-3 Lindsay Davenport #6 Match data Jun 6, 1995* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay
Lindsay Davenport #7 3-6 6-1 6-2 Kimiko Date #9 Match data May 28, 1995* Strasbourg WTA 500 F Clay
Kimiko Date #9 6-1 6-2 Lindsay Davenport #6 Match data Feb 6, 1995* Tokyo WTA 1000 F Carpet
Lindsay Davenport #7 6-4 4-1 (ret.) Kimiko Date #8 Match data Jan 14, 1995* Sydney WTA 500 SF Hard
Kimiko Date #13 6-2 6-4 Lindsay Davenport #21 Match data Sep 26, 1993* Tokyo Nichirei WTA 250 QF Hard

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kimiko Date #1,191 #4 1,280 2,091 245 190 56.3% 0 0 1 0 3 4 8
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,375 711 191 78.8% 3 1 13 1 25 12 55

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kimiko Date Lindsay Davenport
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0
16 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,512 0 0
17 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,859 0 1
18 1989 6–5 54.5% #119 1,563 0 0 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,023 0 3
19 1990 10–7 58.8% #79 1,665 0 0 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,959 0 4
20 1991 12–11 52.2% #32 1,725 0 0 1996 47–15 75.8% #9 2,064 0 7
21 1992 27–14 65.9% #21 1,853 0 1 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,166 0 13
22 1993 25–11 69.4% #13 1,948 0 2 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,286 1 19
23 1994 32–12 72.7% #9 1,985 0 4 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,327 2 26
24 1995 39–12 76.5% #4 2,028 0 5 2000 57–14 80.3% #2 2,254 3 30
25 1996 34–14 70.8% #8 2,076 0 7 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,298 3 37
26 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,165 3 37
27 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,074 3 38
28 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,208 3 45
29 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,215 3 51
30 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,132 3 51
31 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,156 3 53
32 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,111 3 55
37 2008 0–1 0.0% #189 2,048 0 7
38 2009 6–11 35.3% #69 1,845 0 8
39 2010 19–18 51.4% #51 1,823 0 8
40 2011 7–24 22.6% #87 1,570 0 8
41 2012 2–14 12.5% #99 1,456 0 8
42 2013 12–15 44.4% #75 1,576 0 8
43 2014 11–14 44.0% #90 1,598 0 8
44 2015 3–6 33.3% #182 1,574 0 8
46 2017 0–1 0.0% #1191 1,564 0 8