H2H data updated: 2026-07-25 23:01 UTC
Kimiko Date vs Magdalena Maleeva H2H: 1-1
Kimiko Date and Magdalena Maleeva are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Magdalena Maleeva leads 1–0 on clay, while Kimiko Date leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kimiko Date won the 1996 Atlanta Olympics fourth round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 55
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
BUL
Age 51
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 1996* | Atlanta Olympics | Olympics | R16 | Hard | Kimiko Date | 6-4 6-4 | Magdalena Maleeva | Match data |
| Aug 2, 1992* | Barcelona Olympics | Olympics | R32 | Clay | Magdalena Maleeva | 6-2 6-4 | Kimiko Date | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimiko Date | #1,191 | #4 | 1,280 | 1,572 | 4 | 2 | 66.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Magdalena Maleeva | #401 | #4 | 1,834 | 2,069 | 389 | 275 | 58.6% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kimiko Date | Magdalena Maleeva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #216 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #72 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #38 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #20 | 1,918 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #16 | 1,965 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #11 | 1,988 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 37–12 | 75.5% | #6 | 2,047 | 0 | 6 |
| 21 | 1992 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #21 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #19 | 1,912 | 0 | 6 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #36 | 1,756 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #116 | 1,719 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #76 | 1,740 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1996 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #8 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #23 | 1,813 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #16 | 1,850 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #14 | 1,856 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #30 | 1,746 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #25 | 1,694 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #53 | 1,679 | 0 | 10 |