H2H data updated: 2026-08-08 02:15 UTC

Kimiko Date vs Mana Endo H2H: 3-2

Kimiko Date holds a 3–2 lead over Mana Endo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Kimiko Date leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mana Endo won the 1996 Australian Open second round 6-2 1-6 6-4.

JPN Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
3 2
5 main draw meetings
JPN Age 55 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

WinnerScoreLoserMatch DataDateTournamentCategoryRoundSurface
Mana Endo #64 6-2 1-6 6-4 Kimiko Date #5 Match data Jan 19, 1996* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard
Kimiko Date #8 6-4 6-1 Mana Endo #27 Match data Jan 13, 1995* Sydney WTA 500 R16 Hard
Mana Endo #32 7-5 2-6 6-4 Kimiko Date #7 Match data Sep 24, 1994* Tokyo Nichirei WTA 250 R16 Hard
Kimiko Date #21 6-3 6-2 Mana Endo #74 Match data May 31, 1992* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay
Kimiko Date #25 6-4 6-4 Mana Endo #76 Match data Apr 10, 1992* Tokyo Japan Open WTA 250 R16 Hard

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kimiko Date #1,191 #4 1,280 2,091 245 190 56.3% 0 1 0 3 4 8
Mana Endo #381 #26 413 1,820 78 80 49.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kimiko Date Mana Endo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1989 6–5 54.5% #119 1,563 0 0
19 1990 10–7 58.8% #79 1,665 0 0
20 1991 12–11 52.2% #32 1,725 0 0 1991 4–6 40.0% #118 1,523 0 0
21 1992 27–14 65.9% #21 1,853 0 1 1992 14–11 56.0% #57 1,649 0 0
22 1993 25–11 69.4% #13 1,948 0 2 1993 13–12 52.0% #47 1,700 0 0
23 1994 32–12 72.7% #9 1,985 0 4 1994 17–10 63.0% #28 1,808 0 1
24 1995 39–12 76.5% #4 2,028 0 5 1995 11–14 44.0% #78 1,729 0 1
25 1996 34–14 70.8% #8 2,076 0 7 1996 12–13 48.0% #54 1,685 0 1
26 1997 6–11 35.3% #115 1,591 0 1
27 1998 1–3 25.0% #316 1,562 0 1
37 2008 0–1 0.0% #189 2,048 0 7
38 2009 6–11 35.3% #69 1,845 0 8
39 2010 19–18 51.4% #51 1,823 0 8
40 2011 7–24 22.6% #87 1,570 0 8
41 2012 2–14 12.5% #99 1,456 0 8
42 2013 12–15 44.4% #75 1,576 0 8
43 2014 11–14 44.0% #90 1,598 0 8
44 2015 3–6 33.3% #182 1,574 0 8
46 2017 0–1 0.0% #1191 1,564 0 8