H2H data updated: 2026-09-23 00:00 UTC

Kimiko Date vs Marianne Werdel Witmeyer H2H: 3-0

Kimiko Date holds a 3–0 lead over Marianne Werdel Witmeyer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Kimiko Date leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kimiko Date won the 1996 Key Biscayne round of 32 6-0 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kimiko Date
JPN Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main-draw meetings
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer
USA

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kimiko Date #8 6-0 6-0 Marianne Werdel Witmeyer Match data Mar 24, 1996* R32 Key Biscayne Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Kimiko Date #9 6-1 7-5 Marianne Werdel Witmeyer Match data Mar 22, 1995* QF Key Biscayne Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Kimiko Date #26 6-1 7-5 Marianne Werdel Witmeyer Match data Mar 14, 1993* R64 Key Biscayne Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kimiko Date #1,191 #4 1,280 2,092 245 190 56.3% 0 1 0 2 5 8
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer — — — 1,850 181 203 47.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Kimiko Date Marianne Werdel Witmeyer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1989 6–5 54.5% #119 1,563 0 0 1983 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0
1990 10–7 58.8% #79 1,665 0 0 1984 0–1 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
1991 12–11 52.2% #32 1,724 0 0 1985 6–3 66.7% — 1,541 0 1
1992 27–14 65.9% #21 1,853 0 1 1986 13–10 56.5% — 1,683 0 1
1993 25–11 69.4% #13 1,947 0 2 1987 10–17 37.0% — 1,659 0 1
1994 32–12 72.7% #9 1,985 0 4 1988 11–20 35.5% — 1,586 0 1
1995 39–12 76.5% #4 2,029 0 5 1989 13–17 43.3% — 1,592 0 1
1996 34–14 70.8% #8 2,077 0 7 1990 18–18 50.0% — 1,745 0 1
2008 0–1 0.0% #189 2,048 0 7 1991 21–19 52.5% — 1,739 0 1
2009 6–11 35.3% #69 1,845 0 8 1992 13–17 43.3% — 1,697 0 1
2010 19–18 51.4% #51 1,823 0 8 1993 21–18 53.8% — 1,748 0 1
2011 7–24 22.6% #87 1,570 0 8 1994 22–22 50.0% — 1,773 0 1
2012 2–14 12.5% #99 1,456 0 8 1995 20–18 52.6% — 1,787 0 1
2013 12–15 44.4% #75 1,576 0 8 1996 8–18 30.8% — 1,665 0 1
2014 11–14 44.0% #90 1,597 0 8 1997 5–4 55.6% — 1,673 0 1
2015 3–6 33.3% #182 1,573 0 8 — — — — — — —
2017 0–1 0.0% #1191 1,564 0 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Kimiko Date Marianne Werdel Witmeyer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1989 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1983 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
1990 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
1991 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1985 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
1992 15 6 21 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1986 10 8 18 55.6% — — — — — — — — 3 2 5 60.0%
1993 18 6 24 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 1987 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 5 11 54.5%
1994 26 5 31 83.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1988 9 16 25 36.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
1995 16 6 22 72.7% 11 3 14 78.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 6 1 7 85.7% 1989 11 14 25 44.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
1996 25 8 33 75.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1990 14 12 26 53.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 16 11 27 59.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
2009 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1992 11 12 23 47.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
2010 17 15 32 53.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1993 14 10 24 58.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
2011 4 16 20 20.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1994 15 13 28 53.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
2012 2 11 13 15.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1995 14 11 25 56.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7%
2013 10 12 22 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1996 3 10 13 23.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
2014 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1997 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — —
2015 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 170 127 297 57.2% 24 27 51 47.1% 31 24 55 56.4% 20 12 32 62.5% Career 125 129 254 49.2% 7 20 27 25.9% 11 20 31 35.5% 33 33 66 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Kimiko Date Marianne Werdel Witmeyer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1989 1563 118.2 — — — — -9 — +53 48.0% +0.24 3–0 (100%) 1–1 — +1.20 1983 1492 100.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.02
1990 1665 128.2 — — — — -15 — — 57.1% +0.40 1–0 3–2 (60%) — -0.03 1984 1478 96.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.29
1991 1725 132.7 — — — — -22 — -81 52.7% +0.15 4–5 (44%) 3–1 (75%) 100.6 +0.73 1985 1542 112.3 — — — — +15 — — 63.2% +0.89 1–0 0–1 — +0.37
1992 1854 155.6 — — — — +53 -237 -209 60.9% +0.92 8–2 (80%) 1–5 (17%) 104.6 -0.72 1986 1683 123.1 — — — — +21 — — 50.0% -0.34 8–2 (80%) 5–1 (83%) — +1.30
1993 1948 158.1 — — — — +75 -344 — 62.8% +1.00 7–1 (88%) 4–3 (57%) 105.3 -0.46 1987 1659 129.2 — — — — +44 — -85 41.9% -0.77 2–6 (25%) 3–0 (100%) — -0.83
1994 1985 161.2 — — — — +87 -347 -333 67.0% +1.34 10–7 (59%) 3–1 (75%) 99.4 -0.33 1988 1587 119.6 — — — — +2 — -37 37.3% -1.03 2–3 (40%) 3–2 (60%) 100.4 -1.05
1995 2030 160.2 — — — — +41 -192 -291 71.6% +1.43 11–5 (69%) 6–1 (86%) 104.6 -2.22 1989 1592 119.9 — — — — -6 — — 44.1% -0.25 4–4 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 99.6 +2.41
1996 2077 165.2 — — — — +20 -248 -187 65.8% +1.32 11–9 (55%) 1–5 (17%) 97.0 -0.42 1990 1746 136.3 — — — — +8 -257 — 51.7% +0.10 7–10 (41%) 6–4 (60%) 103.1 -0.70
2008 2049 101.3 +0.44 -0.26 0.663 40.6% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05 1991 1740 132.5 — — — — +15 -243 -169 48.9% -0.13 10–4 (71%) 5–4 (56%) 103.3 +0.98
2009 1845 123.3 -0.97 +0.28 0.931 48.6% +25 — — 44.4% -0.38 3–8 (27%) 2–3 (40%) 87.7 -0.84 1992 1697 133.3 — — — — +32 — -146 48.5% 0.00 3–7 (30%) 4–1 (80%) 98.1 +0.32
2010 1823 145.4 -0.25 +1.83 0.998 49.9% +18 -46 — 51.8% -0.11 11–8 (58%) 9–2 (82%) 107.5 -3.09 1993 1749 139.9 — — — — +28 -270 -150 51.6% +0.31 8–5 (62%) 2–2 (50%) 101.6 -0.37
2011 1571 117.6 -2.22 +0.23 0.876 46.9% +27 +117 +226 27.3% -1.21 0–4 (0%) 3–10 (23%) 88.8 -2.48 1994 1773 143.7 — — — — +15 -260 -181 48.5% -0.08 9–6 (60%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.29
2012 1457 113.8 -2.85 -1.69 0.875 47.1% +33 — — 20.0% -1.63 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — -0.10 1995 1788 149.0 — — — — +45 -292 — 54.1% +0.31 5–6 (45%) 3–2 (60%) 101.2 +0.06
2013 1576 135.2 -1.65 +2.04 0.997 50.0% +7 — +183 46.4% +0.04 2–4 (33%) 0–7 (0%) 93.6 -0.50 1996 1666 124.9 — — — — +54 -192 — 31.6% -1.28 3–2 (60%) 2–0 — +0.43
2014 1597 125.2 -1.57 -0.21 0.942 48.7% -18 — +178 50.8% -0.15 5–8 (38%) 5–4 (56%) 97.7 -0.26 1997 1673 119.1 — — — — +35 — — 52.6% +0.37 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.07
2015 1574 113.0 -2.60 -0.62 0.817 46.3% -2 — — 35.0% -0.65 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2017 1564 90.3 +0.60 +0.07 0.246 20.3% — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 2093 154.4 -1.51 +0.62 0.928 48.3% +30 -185 -61 55.2% +0.45 77–65 (54%) 42–48 (47%) 95.3 -2.24 Career 1850 139.7 — — — — +22 -251 -124 47.3% -0.20 63–57 (53%) 39–25 (61%) 108.6 +0.74

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.