H2H data updated: 2026-08-08 02:15 UTC
Kimiko Date vs Marianne Werdel Witmeyer H2H: 3-0
Kimiko Date holds a 3–0 lead over Marianne Werdel Witmeyer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Kimiko Date leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kimiko Date won the 1996 Key Biscayne third round 6-0 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 55
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Winner | Score | Loser | Match Data | Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimiko Date | 6-0 6-0 | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data | Mar 24, 1996* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard |
| Kimiko Date | 6-1 7-5 | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data | Mar 22, 1995* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | QF | Hard |
| Kimiko Date | 6-1 7-5 | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data | Mar 14, 1993* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimiko Date | #1,191 | #4 | 1,280 | 2,091 | 245 | 190 | 56.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 8 |
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | — | — | — | 1,850 | 181 | 203 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Kimiko Date | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #119 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #79 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #32 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 1 |
| 1992 | 27–14 | 65.9% | #21 | 1,853 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 1 |
| 1993 | 25–11 | 69.4% | #13 | 1,948 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 1994 | 32–12 | 72.7% | #9 | 1,985 | 0 | 4 | 1988 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,587 | 0 | 1 |
| 1995 | 39–12 | 76.5% | #4 | 2,028 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 1 |
| 1996 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #8 | 2,076 | 0 | 7 | 1990 | 18–18 | 50.0% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #189 | 2,048 | 0 | 7 | 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,739 | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #69 | 1,845 | 0 | 8 | 1992 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 2010 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #51 | 1,823 | 0 | 8 | 1993 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 7–24 | 22.6% | #87 | 1,570 | 0 | 8 | 1994 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #99 | 1,456 | 0 | 8 | 1995 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,787 | 0 | 1 |
| 2013 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #75 | 1,576 | 0 | 8 | 1996 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 1 |
| 2014 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #90 | 1,598 | 0 | 8 | 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,673 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,574 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1191 | 1,564 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |