H2H data updated: 2026-08-08 02:15 UTC
Kimiko Date vs Mary Pierce H2H: 1-1
Kimiko Date and Mary Pierce are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kimiko Date leads 1–0 on grass, while Mary Pierce leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kimiko Date won the 1996 Wimbledon quarterfinal 3-6 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 55
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 51
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Winner | Score | Loser | Match Data | Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimiko Date | 3-6 6-3 6-1 | Mary Pierce | Match data | Jul 5, 1996* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | QF | Grass |
| Mary Pierce | 6-1 6-1 | Kimiko Date | Match data | Jan 22, 1993* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimiko Date | #1,191 | #4 | 1,280 | 2,091 | 245 | 190 | 56.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 8 |
| Mary Pierce | #560 | #3 | 3,797 | 2,145 | 465 | 218 | 68.1% | 2 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 18 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kimiko Date | Mary Pierce | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #107 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 21–9 | 70.0% | #26 | 1,786 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 32–10 | 76.2% | #13 | 1,900 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | 1989 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #119 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #12 | 2,003 | 0 | 5 |
| 19 | 1990 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #79 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #5 | 2,054 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 1991 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #32 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 35–14 | 71.4% | #5 | 2,007 | 1 | 7 |
| 21 | 1992 | 27–14 | 65.9% | #21 | 1,853 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,881 | 1 | 7 |
| 22 | 1993 | 25–11 | 69.4% | #13 | 1,948 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,066 | 1 | 8 |
| 23 | 1994 | 32–12 | 72.7% | #9 | 1,985 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 35–12 | 74.5% | #7 | 2,123 | 1 | 12 |
| 24 | 1995 | 39–12 | 76.5% | #4 | 2,028 | 0 | 5 | 1999 | 45–19 | 70.3% | #5 | 2,053 | 1 | 13 |
| 25 | 1996 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #8 | 2,076 | 0 | 7 | 2000 | 29–11 | 72.5% | #7 | 2,032 | 2 | 15 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #129 | 1,838 | 2 | 15 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #52 | 1,751 | 2 | 15 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #33 | 1,786 | 2 | 15 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #29 | 1,785 | 2 | 16 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 41–12 | 77.4% | #5 | 2,128 | 2 | 18 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #79 | 1,974 | 2 | 18 |
| 37 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #189 | 2,048 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2009 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #69 | 1,845 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2010 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #51 | 1,823 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 2011 | 7–24 | 22.6% | #87 | 1,570 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 41 | 2012 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #99 | 1,456 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 42 | 2013 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #75 | 1,576 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 43 | 2014 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #90 | 1,598 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 44 | 2015 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,574 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 46 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1191 | 1,564 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |