H2H data updated: 2026-08-08 02:15 UTC
Kimiko Date vs Rachel Mcquillan H2H: 2-1
Kimiko Date holds a 2–1 lead over Rachel Mcquillan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Kimiko Date leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Kimiko Date won the 1994 Australian Open third round 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 55
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 54
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Winner | Score | Loser | Match Data | Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimiko Date | 6-3 7-5 | Rachel Mcquillan | Match data | Jan 23, 1994* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard |
| Kimiko Date | 6-3 6-2 | Rachel Mcquillan | Match data | Feb 9, 1992* | Osaka | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet |
| Rachel Mcquillan | 6-0 6-4 | Kimiko Date | Match data | Jan 6, 1990* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | QF | Hard |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimiko Date | #1,191 | #4 | 1,280 | 2,091 | 245 | 190 | 56.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 8 |
| Rachel Mcquillan | #971 | #28 | 582 | 1,826 | 163 | 197 | 45.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kimiko Date | Rachel Mcquillan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #159 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #79 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1989 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #119 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #39 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #79 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #36 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #32 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #38 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 27–14 | 65.9% | #21 | 1,853 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #115 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 25–11 | 69.4% | #13 | 1,948 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #61 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 32–12 | 72.7% | #9 | 1,985 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #69 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 39–12 | 76.5% | #4 | 2,028 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #186 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #8 | 2,076 | 0 | 7 | 1997 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #185 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #160 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #107 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #79 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #178 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #355 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 37 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #189 | 2,048 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2009 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #69 | 1,845 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2010 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #51 | 1,823 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 2011 | 7–24 | 22.6% | #87 | 1,570 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 41 | 2012 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #99 | 1,456 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 42 | 2013 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #75 | 1,576 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 43 | 2014 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #90 | 1,598 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 44 | 2015 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,574 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 46 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1191 | 1,564 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |