H2H data updated: 2026-10-18 00:00 UTC

Kimiko Date vs Romina Oprandi H2H: 0-1

Romina Oprandi holds a 1–0 lead over Kimiko Date in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Romina Oprandi leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Romina Oprandi won the 2011 's Hertogenbosch quarterfinal 7-6(3) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kimiko Date
JPN Age 56 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Romina Oprandi
Switzerland Age 40 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Romina Oprandi #82 7-6(3) 6-4 Kimiko Date #63 Match data Jun 18, 2011* QF 's Hertogenbosch International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kimiko Date #1,191 #4 1,280 2,092 245 190 56.3% 0 1 0 2 5 8
Romina Oprandi #895 #32 1,490 1,693 54 88 38.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kimiko Date Romina Oprandi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1989 6–5 54.5% #119 1,563 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1990 10–7 58.8% #79 1,665 0 0 2005 0–1 0.0% #187 1,487 0 0
20 1991 12–11 52.2% #32 1,725 0 0 2006 7–7 50.0% #53 1,547 0 0
21 1992 27–14 65.9% #21 1,853 0 1 2007 5–14 26.3% #256 1,495 0 0
22 1993 25–11 69.4% #13 1,947 0 2 — — — — — — —
23 1994 32–12 72.7% #9 1,985 0 4 2009 0–1 0.0% #215 1,481 0 0
24 1995 39–12 76.5% #4 2,029 0 5 2010 4–5 44.4% #66 1,518 0 0
25 1996 34–14 70.8% #8 2,077 0 7 2011 6–14 30.0% #82 1,523 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 2012 9–14 39.1% #61 1,557 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2013 13–13 50.0% #78 1,624 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2014 9–14 39.1% #114 1,581 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2015 1–2 33.3% #124 1,570 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2016 0–3 0.0% #397 1,494 0 0
37 2008 0–1 0.0% #189 2,048 0 7 — — — — — — —
38 2009 6–11 35.3% #69 1,845 0 8 — — — — — — —
39 2010 19–18 51.4% #51 1,823 0 8 — — — — — — —
40 2011 7–24 22.6% #87 1,571 0 8 — — — — — — —
41 2012 2–14 12.5% #99 1,456 0 8 — — — — — — —
42 2013 12–15 44.4% #75 1,576 0 8 — — — — — — —
43 2014 11–14 44.0% #90 1,597 0 8 — — — — — — —
44 2015 3–6 33.3% #182 1,574 0 8 — — — — — — —
46 2017 0–1 0.0% #1191 1,564 0 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kimiko Date Romina Oprandi
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1989 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1991 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2006 1 3 4 25.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 1992 15 6 21 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 2007 3 7 10 30.0% 2 7 9 22.2% — — — — — — — —
22 1993 18 6 24 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1994 26 5 31 83.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2009 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 1995 16 6 22 72.7% 11 3 14 78.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 6 1 7 85.7% 2010 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 1996 25 8 33 75.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 2011 1 7 8 12.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 7 10 17 41.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 5 6 11 45.5% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 3 8 11 27.3% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
37 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2009 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2010 17 15 32 53.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2011 4 16 20 20.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 2012 2 11 13 15.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 2013 10 12 22 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 2014 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
44 2015 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
46 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 170 127 297 57.2% 24 27 51 47.1% 31 24 55 56.4% 20 12 32 62.5% — 21 46 67 31.3% 28 33 61 45.9% 5 9 14 35.7% — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kimiko Date Romina Oprandi
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1989 1563 118.2 — — — — -9 — +54 48.0% +0.24 3–0 (100%) 1–1 — +1.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 1665 128.3 — — — — -16 — — 57.1% +0.40 1–0 3–2 (60%) — -0.03 2005 1487 99.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.02
20 1991 1725 132.8 — — — — -22 — -81 52.7% +0.15 4–5 (44%) 3–1 (75%) 100.6 +0.73 2006 1548 120.6 +1.33 +1.37 1.239 53.7% -48 +87 — 57.1% +0.57 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — +0.22
21 1992 1854 155.6 — — — — +54 -237 -209 60.9% +0.92 8–2 (80%) 1–5 (17%) 104.6 -0.72 2007 1495 106.7 -2.56 -1.16 0.858 46.5% -1 +26 — 35.0% -1.13 2–4 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 98.8 -0.84
22 1993 1948 158.1 — — — — +75 -344 — 62.8% +1.00 7–1 (88%) 4–3 (57%) 105.3 -0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1994 1985 161.3 — — — — +87 -347 -333 67.0% +1.34 10–7 (59%) 3–1 (75%) 99.4 -0.33 2009 1481 102.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% +0.33 0–1 0–2 — +0.05
24 1995 2030 160.3 — — — — +41 -192 -291 71.6% +1.43 11–5 (69%) 6–1 (86%) 104.6 -2.22 2010 1519 100.5 -1.38 -0.02 0.918 47.8% — +39 — 35.3% -1.35 1–0 — — +0.10
25 1996 2077 165.2 — — — — +20 -248 -187 65.8% +1.32 11–9 (55%) 1–5 (17%) 97.0 -0.42 2011 1523 112.0 -3.05 -0.58 0.922 47.8% -80 +24 +91 41.9% -0.77 1–6 (14%) 3–3 (50%) 95.4 -0.18
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1558 122.9 -0.52 +0.09 0.976 49.4% -46 -25 +75 45.1% -0.45 0–5 (0%) 2–3 (40%) 94.4 +0.41
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1625 126.4 +0.01 +1.10 1.052 51.0% -75 +5 — 49.1% +0.05 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) 102.2 +0.81
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1581 119.3 -1.87 -2.45 0.871 47.1% -31 +56 — 43.1% -0.67 3–4 (43%) 1–0 — +0.44
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1570 99.2 -3.28 -1.26 0.709 44.1% -29 — — 42.9% -1.72 0–1 — — +0.04
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1494 89.3 -2.34 -2.54 0.738 43.6% — — — 14.3% -2.28 0–1 0–1 — +0.35
37 2008 2049 101.3 +0.44 -0.26 0.663 40.6% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2009 1846 123.3 -0.97 +0.28 0.931 48.6% +24 — — 44.4% -0.38 3–8 (27%) 2–3 (40%) 87.7 -0.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2010 1823 145.4 -0.25 +1.83 0.998 49.9% +18 -46 — 51.8% -0.11 11–8 (58%) 9–2 (82%) 107.5 -3.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2011 1571 117.7 -2.22 +0.23 0.876 46.9% +28 +117 +226 27.3% -1.21 0–4 (0%) 3–10 (23%) 88.8 -2.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 2012 1457 113.8 -2.85 -1.69 0.875 47.1% +35 — — 20.0% -1.63 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 2013 1577 135.2 -1.65 +2.04 0.997 50.0% +6 — +183 46.4% +0.04 2–4 (33%) 0–7 (0%) 93.6 -0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 2014 1598 125.2 -1.57 -0.21 0.942 48.7% -19 — +178 50.8% -0.15 5–8 (38%) 5–4 (56%) 97.7 -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
44 2015 1574 113.0 -2.60 -0.62 0.817 46.3% -2 — — 35.0% -0.65 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
46 2017 1565 90.3 +0.60 +0.07 0.246 20.3% — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2093 154.4 -1.51 +0.62 0.928 48.3% +30 -185 -61 55.2% +0.45 77–65 (54%) 42–48 (47%) 95.3 -2.23 — 1694 120.4 -1.39 -0.42 0.939 48.5% -45 +35 +86 43.1% -0.56 14–28 (33%) 12–14 (46%) 93.0 +0.99

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.