H2H data updated: 2026-08-08 02:15 UTC

Kimiko Date vs Rosalyn Fairbank H2H: 1-2

Rosalyn Fairbank holds a 2–1 lead over Kimiko Date in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Rosalyn Fairbank leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Rosalyn Fairbank won the 1993 Delray Beach second round 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kimiko Date
JPN Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Rosalyn Fairbank
USA Age 65 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

WinnerScoreLoserMatch DataDateTournamentCategoryRoundSurface
Rosalyn Fairbank #52 6-2 6-4 Kimiko Date #24 Match data Mar 3, 1993* Delray Beach WTA 250 R64 Hard
Rosalyn Fairbank #85 7-6 6-1 Kimiko Date #16 Match data Jun 18, 1992* Eastbourne WTA 250 R32 Grass
Kimiko Date #119 6-4 6-3 Rosalyn Fairbank #22 Match data Jan 4, 1990* Brisbane WTA 500 R32 Hard

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kimiko Date #1,191 #4 1,280 2,091 245 190 56.3% 0 1 0 3 4 8
Rosalyn Fairbank #325 #15 51 1,933 336 309 52.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kimiko Date Rosalyn Fairbank
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1978 3–2 60.0% — 1,539 0 0
18 1989 6–5 54.5% #119 1,563 0 0 1979 17–10 63.0% — 1,725 0 0
19 1990 10–7 58.8% #79 1,665 0 0 1980 22–20 52.4% — 1,678 0 0
20 1991 12–11 52.2% #32 1,725 0 0 1981 15–22 40.5% — 1,657 0 0
21 1992 27–14 65.9% #21 1,853 0 1 1982 32–21 60.4% — 1,898 0 0
22 1993 25–11 69.4% #13 1,948 0 2 1983 24–19 55.8% — 1,919 0 1
23 1994 32–12 72.7% #9 1,985 0 4 1984 22–26 45.8% #32 1,767 0 1
24 1995 39–12 76.5% #4 2,028 0 5 1985 28–23 54.9% #38 1,807 0 1
25 1996 34–14 70.8% #8 2,076 0 7 1986 23–20 53.5% #28 1,825 0 1
26 — — — — — — — 1987 21–20 51.2% #36 1,756 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 1988 27–22 55.1% #37 1,773 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 1989 27–18 60.0% #22 1,845 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 1990 26–20 56.5% #24 1,787 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 1991 14–19 42.4% #90 1,637 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 1992 16–16 50.0% #46 1,726 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 1993 17–19 47.2% #63 1,766 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 1994 0–4 0.0% #284 1,704 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 1995 2–8 20.0% #261 1,599 0 1
37 2008 0–1 0.0% #189 2,048 0 7 — — — — — — —
38 2009 6–11 35.3% #69 1,845 0 8 — — — — — — —
39 2010 19–18 51.4% #51 1,823 0 8 — — — — — — —
40 2011 7–24 22.6% #87 1,570 0 8 — — — — — — —
41 2012 2–14 12.5% #99 1,456 0 8 — — — — — — —
42 2013 12–15 44.4% #75 1,576 0 8 — — — — — — —
43 2014 11–14 44.0% #90 1,598 0 8 — — — — — — —
44 2015 3–6 33.3% #182 1,574 0 8 — — — — — — —
46 2017 0–1 0.0% #1191 1,564 0 8 — — — — — — —