H2H data updated: 2026-08-08 02:15 UTC
Kimiko Date vs Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie H2H: 1-1
Kimiko Date and Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie leads 1–0 on clay, while Kimiko Date leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kimiko Date won the 1996 Indian Wells third round 6-7 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 55
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Age 53
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Winner | Score | Loser | Match Data | Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimiko Date | 6-7 6-1 6-2 | Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | Match data | Mar 11, 1996* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard |
| Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | 4-6 6-2 6-3 | Kimiko Date | Match data | May 27, 1993* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimiko Date | #1,191 | #4 | 1,280 | 2,091 | 245 | 190 | 56.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 8 |
| Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | — | — | — | 1,960 | 186 | 182 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kimiko Date | Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1989 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #119 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #79 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1991 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #32 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 13–15 | 46.4% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 27–14 | 65.9% | #21 | 1,853 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 25–11 | 69.4% | #13 | 1,948 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 17–16 | 51.5% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 32–12 | 72.7% | #9 | 1,985 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 31–16 | 66.0% | — | 1,845 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1995 | 39–12 | 76.5% | #4 | 2,028 | 0 | 5 | 1997 | 37–26 | 58.7% | — | 1,778 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1996 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #8 | 2,076 | 0 | 7 | 1998 | 18–25 | 41.9% | — | 1,696 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,832 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 20–25 | 44.4% | — | 1,671 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 9–17 | 34.6% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 4 |
| 37 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #189 | 2,048 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2009 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #69 | 1,845 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2010 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #51 | 1,823 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 2011 | 7–24 | 22.6% | #87 | 1,570 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 41 | 2012 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #99 | 1,456 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 42 | 2013 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #75 | 1,576 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 43 | 2014 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #90 | 1,598 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 44 | 2015 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,574 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 46 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1191 | 1,564 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |