H2H data updated: 2026-08-08 02:15 UTC
Kimiko Date vs Silke Meier H2H: 3-1
Kimiko Date holds a 3–1 lead over Silke Meier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Kimiko Date leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kimiko Date won the 1995 US Open first round 6-0 2-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 55
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
GER
Age 58
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Winner | Score | Loser | Match Data | Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimiko Date | 6-0 2-6 6-2 | Silke Meier | Match data | Aug 30, 1995* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard |
| Kimiko Date | 6-0 6-4 | Silke Meier | Match data | May 18, 1995* | German Open | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay |
| Silke Meier | 6-4 4-6 6-2 | Kimiko Date | Match data | May 12, 1994* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay |
| Kimiko Date | 4-6 6-4 6-3 | Silke Meier | Match data | May 28, 1992* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimiko Date | #1,191 | #4 | 1,280 | 2,091 | 245 | 190 | 56.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 8 |
| Silke Meier | #948 | #40 | 101 | 1,667 | 81 | 141 | 36.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kimiko Date | Silke Meier | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #164 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1989 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #119 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #50 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #79 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #99 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #32 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 27–14 | 65.9% | #21 | 1,853 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #132 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 25–11 | 69.4% | #13 | 1,948 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #138 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 32–12 | 72.7% | #9 | 1,985 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #80 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 39–12 | 76.5% | #4 | 2,028 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #151 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #8 | 2,076 | 0 | 7 | 1994 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #113 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #91 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #205 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #234 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 37 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #189 | 2,048 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2009 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #69 | 1,845 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2010 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #51 | 1,823 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 2011 | 7–24 | 22.6% | #87 | 1,570 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 41 | 2012 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #99 | 1,456 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 42 | 2013 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #75 | 1,576 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 43 | 2014 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #90 | 1,598 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 44 | 2015 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,574 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 46 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1191 | 1,564 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |