H2H data updated: 2026-08-08 02:15 UTC
Kimiko Date vs Silvia Farina Elia H2H: 1-1
Kimiko Date and Silvia Farina Elia are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Silvia Farina Elia leads 1–0 on grass, while Kimiko Date leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kimiko Date won the 1996 Key Biscayne fourth round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 55
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 54
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Winner | Score | Loser | Match Data | Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimiko Date | 6-2 6-2 | Silvia Farina Elia | Match data | Mar 25, 1996* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard |
| Silvia Farina Elia | 5-7 6-3 10-8 | Kimiko Date | Match data | Jun 16, 1994* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimiko Date | #1,191 | #4 | 1,280 | 2,091 | 245 | 190 | 56.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 8 |
| Silvia Farina Elia | #32 | #11 | 1,838 | 1,943 | 369 | 312 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kimiko Date | Silvia Farina Elia | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1989 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #119 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #194 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #79 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #32 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #172 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 27–14 | 65.9% | #21 | 1,853 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #85 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 25–11 | 69.4% | #13 | 1,948 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #52 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 32–12 | 72.7% | #9 | 1,985 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #52 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 39–12 | 76.5% | #4 | 2,028 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #34 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #8 | 2,076 | 0 | 7 | 1997 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #43 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #19 | 1,901 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #26 | 1,783 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #63 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 45–26 | 63.4% | #14 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 42–28 | 60.0% | #17 | 1,745 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #24 | 1,719 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #20 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #32 | 1,642 | 0 | 3 |
| 37 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #189 | 2,048 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2009 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #69 | 1,845 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2010 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #51 | 1,823 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 2011 | 7–24 | 22.6% | #87 | 1,570 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 41 | 2012 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #99 | 1,456 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 42 | 2013 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #75 | 1,576 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 43 | 2014 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #90 | 1,598 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 44 | 2015 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,574 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 46 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1191 | 1,564 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |