H2H data updated: 2026-09-23 00:00 UTC

Kimiko Date vs Stephanie Rehe H2H: 1-0

Kimiko Date holds a 1–0 lead over Stephanie Rehe in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kimiko Date leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Kimiko Date won the 1991 Birmingham round of 64 6-4 2-6 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kimiko Date
JPN Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Stephanie Rehe
USA Age 56 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kimiko Date #132 6-4 2-6 7-5 Stephanie Rehe #57 Match data Jun 12, 1991* R64 Birmingham Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kimiko Date #1,191 #4 1,280 2,092 245 190 56.3% 0 1 0 2 5 8
Stephanie Rehe #156 #10 60 2,005 134 98 57.8% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kimiko Date Stephanie Rehe
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
11 — — — — — — — 1981 1–1 50.0% — 1,502 0 0
13 — — — — — — — 1983 0–4 0.0% — 1,472 0 0
14 — — — — — — — 1984 1–5 16.7% #182 1,461 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1985 23–12 65.7% #18 1,805 0 2
16 — — — — — — — 1986 25–16 61.0% #19 1,823 0 2
17 — — — — — — — 1987 17–8 68.0% #28 1,868 0 3
18 1989 6–5 54.5% #119 1,563 0 0 1988 43–19 69.4% #14 1,970 0 5
19 1990 10–7 58.8% #79 1,665 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1991 12–11 52.2% #32 1,724 0 0 1990 7–6 53.8% #58 1,972 0 5
21 1992 27–14 65.9% #21 1,853 0 1 1991 5–12 29.4% #123 1,768 0 5
22 1993 25–11 69.4% #13 1,947 0 2 1992 9–13 40.9% #74 1,746 0 5
23 1994 32–12 72.7% #9 1,985 0 4 1993 3–2 60.0% #156 1,759 0 5
24 1995 39–12 76.5% #4 2,029 0 5 — — — — — — —
25 1996 34–14 70.8% #8 2,077 0 7 — — — — — — —
37 2008 0–1 0.0% #189 2,048 0 7 — — — — — — —
38 2009 6–11 35.3% #69 1,845 0 8 — — — — — — —
39 2010 19–18 51.4% #51 1,823 0 8 — — — — — — —
40 2011 7–24 22.6% #87 1,570 0 8 — — — — — — —
41 2012 2–14 12.5% #99 1,456 0 8 — — — — — — —
42 2013 12–15 44.4% #75 1,576 0 8 — — — — — — —
43 2014 11–14 44.0% #90 1,597 0 8 — — — — — — —
44 2015 3–6 33.3% #182 1,573 0 8 — — — — — — —
46 2017 0–1 0.0% #1191 1,564 0 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kimiko Date Stephanie Rehe
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 17 7 24 70.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 15 8 23 65.2% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 10 3 13 76.9% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
18 1989 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1988 33 14 47 70.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 7 2 9 77.8%
19 1990 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1991 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1990 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 4 3 7 57.1%
21 1992 15 6 21 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1991 2 4 6 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
22 1993 18 6 24 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 1992 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — — — — — 4 5 9 44.4%
23 1994 26 5 31 83.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1993 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1995 16 6 22 72.7% 11 3 14 78.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1996 25 8 33 75.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2009 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2010 17 15 32 53.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2011 4 16 20 20.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 2012 2 11 13 15.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 2013 10 12 22 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 2014 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
44 2015 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
46 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 170 127 297 57.2% 24 27 51 47.1% 31 24 55 56.4% 20 12 32 62.5% — 89 52 141 63.1% 12 17 29 41.4% 4 7 11 36.4% 28 21 49 57.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kimiko Date Stephanie Rehe
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1502 97.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% -1.25 — — — 0.00
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1472 101.2 — — — — — +53 — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–2 — -0.11
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1461 107.5 — — — — +98 — — 33.3% -1.27 0–3 (0%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.08
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1805 137.6 — — — — +30 — -204 66.2% +1.22 2–5 (29%) 1–4 (20%) 96.2 +1.03
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1824 143.8 — — — — +5 -244 — 59.8% +0.59 9–8 (53%) 6–4 (60%) 99.5 -0.44
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1868 140.6 — — — — +24 -213 — 66.7% +0.83 4–2 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 107.0 -1.01
18 1989 1563 118.2 — — — — -9 — +53 48.0% +0.24 3–0 (100%) 1–1 — +1.20 1988 1971 150.3 — — — — +36 -321 -361 63.4% +0.84 16–4 (80%) 9–7 (56%) 109.5 +1.45
19 1990 1665 128.2 — — — — -15 — — 57.1% +0.40 1–0 3–2 (60%) — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1991 1725 132.7 — — — — -22 — -81 52.7% +0.15 4–5 (44%) 3–1 (75%) 100.6 +0.73 1990 1972 150.4 — — — — +13 — — 48.4% -0.35 4–1 (80%) 0–2 — -2.64
21 1992 1854 155.6 — — — — +53 -237 -209 60.9% +0.92 8–2 (80%) 1–5 (17%) 104.6 -0.72 1991 1768 119.9 — — — — +127 -164 -189 37.5% -0.45 1–5 (17%) 1–7 (13%) 88.2 +0.02
22 1993 1948 158.1 — — — — +75 -344 — 62.8% +1.00 7–1 (88%) 4–3 (57%) 105.3 -0.46 1992 1746 139.7 — — — — +45 — — 44.0% -0.42 2–6 (25%) 2–4 (33%) 92.1 -2.65
23 1994 1985 161.2 — — — — +87 -347 -333 67.0% +1.34 10–7 (59%) 3–1 (75%) 99.4 -0.33 1993 1759 118.2 — — — — +25 — — 70.0% +2.00 1–1 — — -0.09
24 1995 2030 160.2 — — — — +41 -192 -291 71.6% +1.43 11–5 (69%) 6–1 (86%) 104.6 -2.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1996 2077 165.2 — — — — +20 -248 -187 65.8% +1.32 11–9 (55%) 1–5 (17%) 97.0 -0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2008 2049 101.3 +0.44 -0.26 0.663 40.6% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2009 1845 123.3 -0.97 +0.28 0.931 48.6% +25 — — 44.4% -0.38 3–8 (27%) 2–3 (40%) 87.7 -0.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2010 1823 145.4 -0.25 +1.83 0.998 49.9% +18 -46 — 51.8% -0.11 11–8 (58%) 9–2 (82%) 107.5 -3.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2011 1571 117.6 -2.22 +0.23 0.876 46.9% +27 +117 +226 27.3% -1.21 0–4 (0%) 3–10 (23%) 88.8 -2.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 2012 1457 113.8 -2.85 -1.69 0.875 47.1% +33 — — 20.0% -1.63 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 2013 1576 135.2 -1.65 +2.04 0.997 50.0% +7 — +183 46.4% +0.04 2–4 (33%) 0–7 (0%) 93.6 -0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 2014 1597 125.2 -1.57 -0.21 0.942 48.7% -18 — +178 50.8% -0.15 5–8 (38%) 5–4 (56%) 97.7 -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
44 2015 1574 113.0 -2.60 -0.62 0.817 46.3% -2 — — 35.0% -0.65 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
46 2017 1564 90.3 +0.60 +0.07 0.246 20.3% — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2093 154.4 -1.51 +0.62 0.928 48.3% +30 -185 -61 55.2% +0.45 77–65 (54%) 42–48 (47%) 95.3 -2.24 — 2005 148.4 — — — — +33 -192 -247 57.2% +0.47 39–35 (53%) 27–34 (44%) 96.6 -1.96

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.