H2H data updated: 2026-08-15 02:40 UTC

Kimiko Date vs Tamarine Tanasugarn H2H: 0-1

Tamarine Tanasugarn holds a 1–0 lead over Kimiko Date in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tamarine Tanasugarn leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tamarine Tanasugarn won the 2010 Osaka final 7-5 6-7(4) 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kimiko Date
JPN Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Tamarine Tanasugarn
THA Age 49 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

WinnerScoreLoserMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tamarine Tanasugarn #94 7-5 6-7(4) 6-1 Kimiko Date #56 Match data Oct 17, 2010* F Osaka WTA 250 Hard

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kimiko Date #1,191 #4 1,280 2,091 245 190 56.3% 0 1 0 3 4 8
Tamarine Tanasugarn #947 #19 1,508 1,824 268 276 49.3% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kimiko Date Tamarine Tanasugarn
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1993 0–1 0.0% #407 1,483 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% #227 1,493 0 0
18 1989 6–5 54.5% #119 1,563 0 0 1995 2–5 28.6% #213 1,479 0 0
19 1990 10–7 58.8% #79 1,665 0 0 1996 9–5 64.3% #75 1,610 0 0
20 1991 12–11 52.2% #32 1,725 0 0 1997 18–20 47.4% #47 1,648 0 0
21 1992 27–14 65.9% #21 1,853 0 1 1998 20–21 48.8% #37 1,701 0 0
22 1993 25–11 69.4% #13 1,948 0 2 1999 8–13 38.1% #71 1,633 0 0
23 1994 32–12 72.7% #9 1,985 0 4 2000 31–19 62.0% #28 1,791 0 0
24 1995 39–12 76.5% #4 2,028 0 5 2001 24–21 53.3% #29 1,698 0 0
25 1996 34–14 70.8% #8 2,076 0 7 2002 32–26 55.2% #28 1,676 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 2003 28–23 54.9% #34 1,694 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 2004 19–25 43.2% #66 1,609 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 2005 7–16 30.4% #122 1,496 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2006 9–7 56.2% #72 1,584 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2007 9–18 33.3% #117 1,568 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2008 19–16 54.3% #37 1,684 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2009 10–12 45.5% #101 1,646 0 3
33 — — — — — — — 2010 14–9 60.9% #62 1,732 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2011 4–10 28.6% #94 1,648 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2012 4–7 36.4% #152 1,595 0 4
37 2008 0–1 0.0% #189 2,048 0 7 — — — — — — —
38 2009 6–11 35.3% #69 1,845 0 8 2015 0–1 0.0% #855 1,577 0 4
39 2010 19–18 51.4% #51 1,823 0 8 — — — — — — —
40 2011 7–24 22.6% #87 1,570 0 8 — — — — — — —
41 2012 2–14 12.5% #99 1,456 0 8 — — — — — — —
42 2013 12–15 44.4% #75 1,576 0 8 — — — — — — —
43 2014 11–14 44.0% #90 1,598 0 8 — — — — — — —
44 2015 3–6 33.3% #182 1,574 0 8 — — — — — — —
46 2017 0–1 0.0% #1191 1,564 0 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kimiko Date Tamarine Tanasugarn
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1989 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1995 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 1991 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1997 12 11 23 52.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1992 15 6 21 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1998 15 12 27 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1993 18 6 24 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 1999 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
23 1994 26 5 31 83.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2000 19 12 31 61.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1995 16 6 22 72.7% 11 3 14 78.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 6 1 7 85.7% 2001 18 15 33 54.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
25 1996 25 8 33 75.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 2002 24 16 40 60.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 21 16 37 56.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 13 18 31 41.9% 0 4 4 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 3 10 13 23.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 7 12 19 36.8% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 8 12 20 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 12 5 17 70.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
37 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2009 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2010 17 15 32 53.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2011 4 16 20 20.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 2012 2 11 13 15.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 2013 10 12 22 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 2014 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
44 2015 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
46 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 170 127 297 57.2% 24 27 51 47.1% 31 24 55 56.4% 20 12 32 62.5% — 183 185 368 49.7% 12 47 59 20.3% 67 37 104 64.4% 6 7 13 46.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 149/164 of Kimiko Date's and 141/267 of Tamarine Tanasugarn's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Kimiko Date Tamarine Tanasugarn
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 6/51 2.0 3.0 58.2% 61.2% 49.7% 35.8% 37.7% 56.3% 42.0%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 4/44 2.0 4.5 59.8% 53.6% 36.4% 48.4% 51.3% 46.9% 39.9%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 9/23 1.8 3.6 58.3% 59.8% 45.3% 40.8% 52.1% 53.8% 48.0%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 3/16 1.7 2.3 62.1% 59.8% 46.6% 49.0% 41.0% 55.0% 41.7%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 21/27 1.4 4.0 59.8% 57.8% 40.3% 47.2% 47.0% 50.7% 40.6%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 30/35 1.1 2.9 62.5% 63.1% 46.1% 61.7% 50.8% 56.7% 42.7%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 20/22 0.8 3.4 65.8% 60.5% 46.3% 57.5% 47.3% 55.3% 42.6%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 22/23 1.0 3.1 68.1% 58.7% 51.5% 55.0% 56.2% 56.1% 48.3%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 14/14 0.7 3.4 63.9% 56.7% 43.6% 34.9% 42.6% 51.9% 40.0%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 11/11 1.0 3.5 64.1% 52.1% 45.1% 43.9% 58.9% 49.2% 41.3%
37 2008 1/1 0.0 2.0 59.2% 51.7% 35.0% 44.4% 33.3% 44.9% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2009 13/17 0.8 4.3 67.1% 59.1% 41.4% 54.1% 46.2% 53.0% 43.8% 2015 1/1 0.0 4.0 67.2% 51.3% 36.8% 50.0% 50.0% 46.6% 30.9%
39 2010 33/37 0.9 3.4 63.8% 59.3% 47.5% 49.2% 52.3% 54.8% 45.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
40 2011 30/31 0.6 3.6 63.3% 56.5% 42.0% 46.1% 41.4% 51.2% 42.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
41 2012 15/16 0.8 3.3 61.9% 58.2% 43.5% 48.8% 55.9% 52.0% 42.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
42 2013 27/27 0.7 2.1 69.1% 57.3% 44.5% 47.7% 51.0% 53.3% 46.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
43 2014 24/25 1.1 3.4 67.2% 57.3% 48.2% 43.4% 49.8% 54.3% 43.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
44 2015 5/9 1.0 5.4 65.2% 53.7% 48.1% 42.2% 47.4% 51.7% 39.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
46 2017 1/1 0.0 3.0 51.5% 23.5% 18.8% 0.0% 0.0% 21.2% 19.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 149/435 0.8 3.3 65.2% 57.4% 44.8% 47.1% 48.6% 52.9% 43.7% — 141/544 1.1 3.3 63.2% 59.0% 45.5% 50.7% 49.7% 53.9% 43.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kimiko Date Tamarine Tanasugarn
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1483 96.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 +0.22
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1493 103.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.83 1–1 — +0.21
18 1989 1563 118.2 — — — — -8 — +54 48.0% +0.24 3–0 (100%) 1–1 +1.06 1995 1479 101.3 — — — — +23 — — 29.4% -1.53 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) +0.42
19 1990 1665 128.3 — — — — -15 — — 57.1% +0.40 1–0 3–2 (60%) +0.20 1996 1610 124.2 — — — — +2 — — 64.3% +1.21 0–2 1–3 (25%) +1.87
20 1991 1725 132.7 — — — — -21 — -80 52.7% +0.15 4–5 (44%) 3–1 (75%) -0.17 1997 1648 125.4 — — — — -4 -102 +10 48.3% -0.34 5–6 (45%) 3–2 (60%) +2.93
21 1992 1854 155.6 — — — — +53 -237 -208 60.9% +0.92 8–2 (80%) 1–5 (17%) -0.85 1998 1702 138.7 — — — — +13 -199 +25 48.9% -0.10 5–5 (50%) 3–4 (43%) +1.92
22 1993 1948 158.1 — — — — +75 -344 — 62.8% +1.00 7–1 (88%) 4–3 (57%) -0.50 1999 1634 113.1 — — — — -11 -164 +111 40.8% -0.57 3–4 (43%) 3–2 (60%) +0.72
23 1994 1985 161.2 — — — — +87 -347 -333 67.0% +1.34 10–7 (59%) 3–1 (75%) -1.12 2000 1792 139.4 — — — — -52 -296 +110 59.5% +0.54 7–4 (64%) 6–7 (46%) +0.69
24 1995 2029 160.2 — — — — +41 -191 -290 71.6% +1.43 11–5 (69%) 6–1 (86%) -1.54 2001 1698 135.5 — — — — +14 -272 +291 51.5% +0.09 8–9 (47%) 7–6 (54%) +2.62
25 1996 2077 165.2 — — — — +20 -248 -187 65.8% +1.32 11–9 (55%) 1–5 (17%) -2.14 2002 1677 130.8 — — — — +37 -232 +254 52.5% +0.01 15–10 (60%) 7–6 (54%) +3.96
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1695 137.1 +0.58 -0.37 0.961 48.9% +45 -272 +201 54.7% +0.32 7–8 (47%) 5–6 (45%) +0.79
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1610 121.0 -2.76 -1.27 0.751 43.8% -13 -221 +321 45.7% -0.05 2–8 (20%) 3–4 (43%) +1.65
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1497 98.5 -0.83 +0.77 1.037 50.9% -9 -166 +399 30.6% -1.35 2–1 (67%) 0–2 +1.19
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1585 113.8 -0.78 -1.37 0.927 47.9% -34 — +318 52.8% +0.56 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) +2.05
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1569 117.4 -2.84 -1.65 0.822 45.7% 0 -212 — 29.8% -1.54 4–3 (57%) 2–1 (67%) -1.28
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1685 130.6 +1.07 -0.63 0.987 49.9% -103 — +347 53.2% -0.05 5–4 (56%) 5–1 (83%) -0.67
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1646 112.2 -0.30 -0.53 0.953 49.0% -110 -287 +344 46.9% -0.18 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) -0.12
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1732 129.8 +0.24 +3.07 1.101 52.2% -26 — +172 55.8% +0.65 5–1 (83%) 2–2 (50%) -0.83
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1648 112.1 -1.46 -2.12 0.832 45.7% -16 — — 28.6% -1.57 — — -0.81
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1595 100.2 -3.00 -1.41 0.812 45.8% +29 — — 31.8% -1.59 1–1 1–1 -0.04
37 2008 2048 101.3 +0.44 -0.26 0.663 40.6% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2009 1845 123.3 -0.97 +0.28 0.931 48.6% +24 — — 44.4% -0.38 3–8 (27%) 2–3 (40%) -0.94 2015 1577 97.4 -0.66 -2.32 0.578 38.9% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 +0.04
39 2010 1823 145.4 -0.25 +1.83 0.998 49.9% +18 -46 — 51.8% -0.11 11–8 (58%) 9–2 (82%) -3.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2011 1571 117.6 -2.22 +0.23 0.876 46.9% +27 +117 +226 27.3% -1.21 0–4 (0%) 3–10 (23%) -2.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 2012 1457 113.8 -2.85 -1.69 0.875 47.1% +33 — — 20.0% -1.63 0–3 (0%) 0–1 +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 2013 1576 135.2 -1.65 +2.04 0.997 50.0% +7 — +183 46.4% +0.04 2–4 (33%) 0–7 (0%) -0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 2014 1598 125.3 -1.57 -0.21 0.942 48.7% -18 — +176 50.8% -0.15 5–8 (38%) 5–4 (56%) +0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
44 2015 1574 112.8 -2.60 -0.62 0.817 46.3% -2 — — 35.0% -0.65 1–1 1–2 (33%) +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
46 2017 1565 90.3 +0.34 -0.32 0.246 20.3% — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2091 154.4 -1.51 +0.62 0.928 48.3% +30 -185 -61 55.2% +0.45 77–65 (54%) 42–48 (47%) -2.80 — 1825 132.1 -0.71 -0.34 0.932 48.5% -6 -214 +226 48.6% -0.13 77–74 (51%) 52–55 (49%) +3.22

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.