H2H data updated: 2026-08-15 02:40 UTC

Kimiko Date vs Vania King H2H: 0-1

Vania King holds a 1–0 lead over Kimiko Date in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Vania King leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Vania King won the 2011 Seoul round of 32 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kimiko Date
JPN Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Vania King
USA Age 37 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

WinnerScoreLoserMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Vania King #98 6-2 6-2 Kimiko Date #61 Match data Sep 22, 2011* R32 Seoul WTA 250 Hard

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kimiko Date #1,191 #4 1,280 2,091 245 190 56.3% 0 1 0 3 4 8
Vania King #824 #50 1,225 1,767 128 160 44.4% 0 0 0 1 0 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kimiko Date Vania King
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2005 1–1 50.0% #164 1,519 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2006 16–13 55.2% #60 1,662 0 1
18 1989 6–5 54.5% #119 1,563 0 0 2007 15–21 41.7% #109 1,625 0 1
19 1990 10–7 58.8% #79 1,665 0 0 2008 7–19 26.9% #128 1,519 0 1
20 1991 12–11 52.2% #32 1,725 0 0 2009 11–12 47.8% #80 1,591 0 1
21 1992 27–14 65.9% #21 1,853 0 1 2010 14–17 45.2% #86 1,597 0 1
22 1993 25–11 69.4% #13 1,948 0 2 2011 13–14 48.1% #76 1,691 0 1
23 1994 32–12 72.7% #9 1,985 0 4 2012 15–19 44.1% #69 1,617 0 1
24 1995 39–12 76.5% #4 2,028 0 5 2013 8–11 42.1% #85 1,631 0 1
25 1996 34–14 70.8% #8 2,076 0 7 2014 13–15 46.4% #111 1,642 0 1
26 — — — — — — — 2015 0–1 0.0% #410 1,627 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 2016 13–11 54.2% #78 1,643 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 2017 1–3 25.0% #492 1,590 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2018 1–3 25.0% #356 1,559 0 1
37 2008 0–1 0.0% #189 2,048 0 7 — — — — — — —
38 2009 6–11 35.3% #69 1,845 0 8 — — — — — — —
39 2010 19–18 51.4% #51 1,823 0 8 — — — — — — —
40 2011 7–24 22.6% #87 1,570 0 8 — — — — — — —
41 2012 2–14 12.5% #99 1,456 0 8 — — — — — — —
42 2013 12–15 44.4% #75 1,576 0 8 — — — — — — —
43 2014 11–14 44.0% #90 1,598 0 8 — — — — — — —
44 2015 3–6 33.3% #182 1,574 0 8 — — — — — — —
46 2017 0–1 0.0% #1191 1,564 0 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kimiko Date Vania King
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 15 10 25 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
18 1989 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2007 11 14 25 44.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
19 1990 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 5 12 17 29.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
20 1991 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2009 9 8 17 52.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
21 1992 15 6 21 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 2010 9 10 19 47.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
22 1993 18 6 24 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 2011 9 10 19 47.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 1994 26 5 31 83.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2012 12 13 25 48.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 1995 16 6 22 72.7% 11 3 14 78.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 6 1 7 85.7% 2013 6 8 14 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 1996 25 8 33 75.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 2014 7 8 15 46.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 10 9 19 52.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
37 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2009 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2010 17 15 32 53.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2011 4 16 20 20.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 2012 2 11 13 15.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 2013 10 12 22 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 2014 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
44 2015 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
46 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 170 127 297 57.2% 24 27 51 47.1% 31 24 55 56.4% 20 12 32 62.5% — 96 109 205 46.8% 26 36 62 41.9% 6 15 21 28.6% — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kimiko Date Vania King
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1520 103.7 -0.64 +0.14 0.625 40.2% — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 — -0.17
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1663 131.1 -1.06 -0.47 0.997 50.5% +24 — — 55.0% +0.35 3–5 (38%) 2–1 (67%) +1.55
18 1989 1563 118.2 — — — — -8 — +54 48.0% +0.24 3–0 (100%) 1–1 +1.06 2007 1625 116.9 -1.39 -3.73 0.818 45.8% +17 -157 +17 43.0% -0.67 5–4 (56%) 7–4 (64%) +0.04
19 1990 1665 128.3 — — — — -15 — — 57.1% +0.40 1–0 3–2 (60%) +0.20 2008 1519 117.5 +0.05 -3.22 0.890 47.7% +49 -52 — 33.9% -0.89 5–7 (42%) 1–5 (17%) -0.43
20 1991 1725 132.7 — — — — -21 — -80 52.7% +0.15 4–5 (44%) 3–1 (75%) -0.17 2009 1592 114.9 -1.54 -1.39 0.910 48.1% +21 -123 -33 44.9% -0.45 3–2 (60%) 2–2 (50%) +0.60
21 1992 1854 155.6 — — — — +53 -237 -208 60.9% +0.92 8–2 (80%) 1–5 (17%) -0.85 2010 1598 117.8 -1.20 +0.84 0.997 49.8% +24 -97 -78 49.3% -0.17 4–9 (31%) 1–4 (20%) +1.71
22 1993 1948 158.1 — — — — +75 -344 — 62.8% +1.00 7–1 (88%) 4–3 (57%) -0.50 2011 1691 130.5 -1.09 +0.98 0.960 48.9% -18 -128 — 48.4% -0.17 5–5 (50%) 4–4 (50%) -1.19
23 1994 1985 161.2 — — — — +87 -347 -333 67.0% +1.34 10–7 (59%) 3–1 (75%) -1.12 2012 1618 128.2 +0.93 +0.08 1.011 50.1% +21 -45 — 48.0% -0.05 3–6 (33%) 5–3 (63%) -1.08
24 1995 2029 160.2 — — — — +41 -191 -290 71.6% +1.43 11–5 (69%) 6–1 (86%) -1.54 2013 1631 118.3 -0.91 -1.79 0.887 47.5% +1 -43 — 41.7% -0.79 6–4 (60%) 3–3 (50%) -0.66
25 1996 2077 165.2 — — — — +20 -248 -187 65.8% +1.32 11–9 (55%) 1–5 (17%) -2.14 2014 1642 125.5 -1.58 -0.66 0.932 48.6% +14 -47 -191 49.2% -0.07 7–4 (64%) 3–2 (60%) -0.71
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1627 102.3 +0.69 -0.52 0.746 43.2% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — -0.02
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1643 124.9 +0.57 +0.85 1.016 50.3% +10 -18 — 53.7% +0.11 3–3 (50%) 5–2 (71%) +0.64
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1590 108.0 -1.98 -0.86 0.750 44.4% +2 — — 37.5% -0.50 1–1 — -0.15
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1559 104.7 -2.66 -1.04 0.768 44.2% +5 — — 25.0% -2.25 — 1–0 +0.14
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1540 97.5 — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2008 2048 101.3 +0.44 -0.26 0.663 40.6% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2009 1845 123.3 -0.97 +0.28 0.931 48.6% +24 — — 44.4% -0.38 3–8 (27%) 2–3 (40%) -0.94 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2010 1823 145.4 -0.25 +1.83 0.998 49.9% +18 -46 — 51.8% -0.11 11–8 (58%) 9–2 (82%) -3.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2011 1571 117.6 -2.22 +0.23 0.876 46.9% +27 +117 +226 27.3% -1.21 0–4 (0%) 3–10 (23%) -2.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 2012 1457 113.8 -2.85 -1.69 0.875 47.1% +33 — — 20.0% -1.63 0–3 (0%) 0–1 +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 2013 1576 135.2 -1.65 +2.04 0.997 50.0% +7 — +183 46.4% +0.04 2–4 (33%) 0–7 (0%) -0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 2014 1598 125.3 -1.57 -0.21 0.942 48.7% -18 — +176 50.8% -0.15 5–8 (38%) 5–4 (56%) +0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
44 2015 1574 112.8 -2.60 -0.62 0.817 46.3% -2 — — 35.0% -0.65 1–1 1–2 (33%) +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
46 2017 1565 90.3 +0.34 -0.32 0.246 20.3% — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2091 154.4 -1.51 +0.62 0.928 48.3% +30 -185 -61 55.2% +0.45 77–65 (54%) 42–48 (47%) -2.80 — 1767 127.9 -0.67 -0.74 0.935 48.6% +16 -78 -65 46.2% -0.31 46–50 (48%) 34–30 (53%) +0.09

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.