H2H data updated: 2026-08-08 02:15 UTC
Kimiko Date vs Yone Kamio H2H: 4-0
Kimiko Date holds a 4–0 lead over Yone Kamio in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Kimiko Date leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Kimiko Date won the 1996 San Diego fourth round 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 55
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 54
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Winner | Score | Loser | Match Data | Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimiko Date | 6-2 7-5 | Yone Kamio | Match data | Aug 23, 1996* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard |
| Kimiko Date | 6-4 6-2 | Yone Kamio | Match data | May 27, 1995* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | SF | Clay |
| Kimiko Date | 6-1 2-6 6-2 | Yone Kamio | Match data | Feb 4, 1995* | Tokyo | WTA 1000 | R16 | Carpet |
| Kimiko Date | 6-0 6-2 | Yone Kamio | Match data | Sep 1, 1994* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimiko Date | #1,191 | #4 | 1,280 | 2,091 | 245 | 190 | 56.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 8 |
| Yone Kamio | #253 | #24 | 191 | 1,788 | 43 | 51 | 45.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kimiko Date | Yone Kamio | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1989 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #119 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #79 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #32 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #133 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 27–14 | 65.9% | #21 | 1,853 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #108 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 25–11 | 69.4% | #13 | 1,948 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #80 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 32–12 | 72.7% | #9 | 1,985 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #28 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 39–12 | 76.5% | #4 | 2,028 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #119 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #8 | 2,076 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #189 | 2,048 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2009 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #69 | 1,845 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2010 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #51 | 1,823 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 2011 | 7–24 | 22.6% | #87 | 1,570 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 41 | 2012 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #99 | 1,456 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 42 | 2013 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #75 | 1,576 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 43 | 2014 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #90 | 1,598 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 44 | 2015 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,574 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 46 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1191 | 1,564 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |