H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Kimiko Date vs Yuliya Beygelzimer H2H: 0-1

Yuliya Beygelzimer holds a 1–0 lead over Kimiko Date in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Yuliya Beygelzimer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yuliya Beygelzimer won the 2015 Pattaya round of 32 5-7 7-6(6) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kimiko Date
JPN Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Yuliya Beygelzimer
Ukraine Age 42 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Yuliya Beygelzimer #166 5-7 7-6(6) 6-2 Kimiko Date #105 Match data Feb 12, 2015* R32 Pattaya International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kimiko Date #1,191 #4 1,280 2,092 245 190 56.3% 0 1 0 2 5 8
Yuliya Beygelzimer #706 #83 430 1,500 11 40 21.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kimiko Date Yuliya Beygelzimer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2001 0–1 0.0% #347 1,488 0 0
18 1989 6–5 54.5% #119 1,563 0 0 2002 0–2 0.0% #159 1,461 0 0
19 1990 10–7 58.8% #79 1,665 0 0 2003 1–4 20.0% #122 1,448 0 0
20 1991 12–11 52.2% #32 1,724 0 0 2004 2–6 25.0% #164 1,444 0 0
21 1992 27–14 65.9% #21 1,853 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 1993 25–11 69.4% #13 1,947 0 2 2006 1–6 14.3% #110 1,432 0 0
23 1994 32–12 72.7% #9 1,985 0 4 2007 2–5 28.6% #226 1,419 0 0
24 1995 39–12 76.5% #4 2,029 0 5 2008 0–1 0.0% #255 1,414 0 0
25 1996 34–14 70.8% #8 2,077 0 7 2009 2–2 50.0% #249 1,435 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2012 2–2 50.0% #178 1,464 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2013 0–4 0.0% #172 1,419 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2014 0–1 0.0% #168 1,417 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2015 1–6 14.3% #216 1,394 0 0
37 2008 0–1 0.0% #189 2,048 0 7 — — — — — — —
38 2009 6–11 35.3% #69 1,845 0 8 — — — — — — —
39 2010 19–18 51.4% #51 1,823 0 8 — — — — — — —
40 2011 7–24 22.6% #87 1,570 0 8 — — — — — — —
41 2012 2–14 12.5% #99 1,456 0 8 — — — — — — —
42 2013 12–15 44.4% #75 1,576 0 8 — — — — — — —
43 2014 11–14 44.0% #90 1,597 0 8 — — — — — — —
44 2015 3–6 33.3% #182 1,573 0 8 — — — — — — —
46 2017 0–1 0.0% #1191 1,564 0 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kimiko Date Yuliya Beygelzimer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1989 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2002 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1990 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1991 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2004 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 1992 15 6 21 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1993 18 6 24 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 2006 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1994 26 5 31 83.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2007 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
24 1995 16 6 22 72.7% 11 3 14 78.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 6 1 7 85.7% 2008 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 1996 25 8 33 75.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 2009 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
37 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2009 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2010 17 15 32 53.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2011 4 16 20 20.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 2012 2 11 13 15.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 2013 10 12 22 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 2014 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
44 2015 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
46 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 170 127 297 57.2% 24 27 51 47.1% 31 24 55 56.4% 20 12 32 62.5% — 6 20 26 23.1% 5 18 23 21.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kimiko Date Yuliya Beygelzimer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1488 98.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.67 0–1 — — -0.01
18 1989 1563 118.2 — — — — -9 — +53 48.0% +0.24 3–0 (100%) 1–1 — +1.20 2002 1461 98.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — +0.08
19 1990 1665 128.2 — — — — -15 — — 57.1% +0.40 1–0 3–2 (60%) — -0.03 2003 1449 106.4 +0.18 -0.75 0.868 48.5% +49 — — 33.3% -0.42 0–2 0–2 — -0.11
20 1991 1725 132.7 — — — — -22 — -81 52.7% +0.15 4–5 (44%) 3–1 (75%) 100.6 +0.73 2004 1444 105.1 -1.32 +0.17 0.741 43.5% +39 +28 — 27.8% -1.22 1–1 0–1 — -0.15
21 1992 1854 155.6 — — — — +53 -237 -209 60.9% +0.92 8–2 (80%) 1–5 (17%) 104.6 -0.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1993 1948 158.1 — — — — +75 -344 — 62.8% +1.00 7–1 (88%) 4–3 (57%) 105.3 -0.46 2006 1433 107.3 -0.82 +0.01 1.007 50.2% +18 — — 25.0% -1.62 0–2 — — -0.70
23 1994 1985 161.2 — — — — +87 -347 -333 67.0% +1.34 10–7 (59%) 3–1 (75%) 99.4 -0.33 2007 1420 97.3 -1.56 -0.25 0.785 44.7% +27 +13 — 33.3% -1.07 0–1 1–0 — +0.39
24 1995 2030 160.2 — — — — +41 -192 -291 71.6% +1.43 11–5 (69%) 6–1 (86%) 104.6 -2.22 2008 1414 103.0 -1.70 -2.47 0.849 46.7% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.14
25 1996 2077 165.2 — — — — +20 -248 -187 65.8% +1.32 11–9 (55%) 1–5 (17%) 97.0 -0.42 2009 1436 103.1 -1.73 -0.10 0.967 49.4% — — — 50.0% -0.70 1–1 1–0 — +0.26
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1464 106.0 -0.72 -0.14 0.993 49.7% — +20 — 54.5% -0.54 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.13
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1419 95.7 -2.60 -3.25 0.795 45.2% — — — 20.0% -1.70 0–2 1–0 — +0.36
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1417 107.1 +2.27 +0.93 0.754 43.4% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.15
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1394 106.5 -4.96 -0.87 0.711 42.2% +36 — — 26.7% -1.47 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.06
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1400 97.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2008 2049 101.3 +0.44 -0.26 0.663 40.6% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2009 1845 123.3 -0.97 +0.28 0.931 48.6% +25 — — 44.4% -0.38 3–8 (27%) 2–3 (40%) 87.7 -0.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2010 1823 145.4 -0.25 +1.83 0.998 49.9% +18 -46 — 51.8% -0.11 11–8 (58%) 9–2 (82%) 107.5 -3.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2011 1571 117.6 -2.22 +0.23 0.876 46.9% +27 +117 +226 27.3% -1.21 0–4 (0%) 3–10 (23%) 88.8 -2.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 2012 1457 113.8 -2.85 -1.69 0.875 47.1% +33 — — 20.0% -1.63 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 2013 1576 135.2 -1.65 +2.04 0.997 50.0% +7 — +183 46.4% +0.04 2–4 (33%) 0–7 (0%) 93.6 -0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 2014 1597 125.2 -1.57 -0.21 0.942 48.7% -18 — +178 50.8% -0.15 5–8 (38%) 5–4 (56%) 97.7 -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
44 2015 1574 113.0 -2.60 -0.62 0.817 46.3% -2 — — 35.0% -0.65 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
46 2017 1564 90.3 +0.60 +0.07 0.246 20.3% — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2093 154.4 -1.51 +0.62 0.928 48.3% +30 -185 -61 55.2% +0.45 77–65 (54%) 42–48 (47%) 95.3 -2.24 — 1500 106.8 -2.17 -0.85 0.838 46.0% +33 +20 — 31.7% -1.22 4–16 (20%) 5–4 (56%) 93.9 -0.71

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.