H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:30 UTC
Kirsten Flipkens vs Jaimee Fourlis H2H: 2-0
Kirsten Flipkens holds a 2–0 lead over Jaimee Fourlis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kirsten Flipkens leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kirsten Flipkens won the 2022 Wimbledon first round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 40
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 26
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2022* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Kirsten Flipkens | 7-5 6-2 | Jaimee Fourlis | Match data |
| Jan 12, 2017* | Hobart | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Kirsten Flipkens | 7-6(10) 6-4 | Jaimee Fourlis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirsten Flipkens | #531 | #13 | 2,961 | 1,829 | 198 | 221 | 47.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Jaimee Fourlis | #392 | #147 | 455 | 1,526 | 4 | 16 | 20.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kirsten Flipkens | Jaimee Fourlis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #380 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #322 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2004 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #168 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #206 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #202 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #252 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2006 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #104 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #111 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #162 | 1,446 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2009 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #81 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #212 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2010 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2011 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #192 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2012 | 13–4 | 76.5% | #54 | 1,762 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2013 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #20 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2014 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #45 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2015 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #85 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2016 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #65 | 1,642 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2017 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #74 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2018 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #47 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2019 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #71 | 1,747 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2020 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #86 | 1,703 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #311 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2022 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #251 | 1,685 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |