H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Klara Koukalova vs Amanda Coetzer H2H: 0-2

Amanda Coetzer holds a 2–0 lead over Klara Koukalova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Amanda Coetzer leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amanda Coetzer won the 2003 Indian Wells second round 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Klara Koukalova
CZE Age 44 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Amanda Coetzer
RSA Age 54 Right-Handed 158 cm / 5'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 7, 2003* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R64 Hard Amanda Coetzer #19 6-2 6-2 Klara Koukalova #71 Match data
Feb 28, 2003* Acapulco WTA 250 R16 Clay Amanda Coetzer #20 6-4 3-6 7-5 Klara Koukalova #73 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Klara Koukalova #566 #20 1,860 1,807 275 285 49.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Amanda Coetzer #289 #3 3,380 2,051 491 307 61.5% 0 1 0 1 7 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Klara Koukalova Amanda Coetzer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1988 3–2 60.0% #152 1,536 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1989 16–13 55.2% #63 1,675 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1990 16–19 45.7% #76 1,662 0 0
19 2001 5–4 55.6% #139 1,519 0 0 1991 15–19 44.1% #68 1,686 0 0
20 2002 4–5 44.4% #117 1,527 0 0 1992 35–15 70.0% #17 1,857 0 0
21 2003 14–19 42.4% #63 1,537 0 0 1993 42–18 70.0% #15 1,991 0 2
22 2004 26–22 54.2% #46 1,648 0 0 1994 38–19 66.7% #18 1,885 0 3
23 2005 32–19 62.7% #35 1,770 0 2 1995 31–22 58.5% #19 1,910 0 3
24 2006 10–22 31.2% #117 1,548 0 2 1996 31–20 60.8% #14 1,863 0 3
25 2007 12–12 50.0% #63 1,579 0 2 1997 60–25 70.6% #4 2,013 0 5
26 2008 21–21 50.0% #72 1,590 0 2 1998 32–23 58.2% #17 1,887 0 6
27 2009 8–17 32.0% #90 1,537 0 2 1999 37–25 59.7% #11 1,815 0 6
28 2010 20–20 50.0% #41 1,656 0 2 2000 44–22 66.7% #12 1,892 0 7
29 2011 29–25 53.7% #41 1,712 0 2 2001 32–21 60.4% #19 1,786 0 8
30 2012 24–21 53.3% #28 1,729 0 2 2002 30–22 57.7% #21 1,795 0 8
31 2013 27–25 51.9% #35 1,679 0 2 2003 27–19 58.7% #25 1,738 0 9
32 2014 29–27 51.8% #40 1,611 0 3 2004 2–3 40.0% #286 1,718 0 9
33 2015 14–22 38.9% #99 1,572 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 2016 0–4 0.0% #400 1,499 0 3 — — — — — — —