Home
/
H2H
/
Klara Koukalova vs Anabel Medina Garrigues
H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC
Klara Koukalova vs Anabel Medina Garrigues H2H: 5-6
Anabel Medina Garrigues holds a 6–5 lead over Klara Koukalova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 11 main-draw meetings, Anabel Medina Garrigues leads 4–1 on clay, while they are tied 2–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Klara Koukalova won the 2013 Miami Open round of 64 6-3 7-6(3).
Quick comparisons
Aryna Sabalenka vs Iga Swiatek Aryna Sabalenka vs Elena Rybakina
Serena Williams vs Venus Williams Martina Navratilova vs Chris Evert
Want to explore more matchups?
Advanced rivalry search
lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 44
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
5
–
6
11 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 44
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
Player Score Player Match Data Date Round Tournament Category Surface
Klara Koukalova
#22
6-3 7-6(3)
Anabel Medina Garrigues
#63
Match data
Mar 20, 2013*
R64
Miami Open
Premier Mandatory
→
modern equivalent
WTA 1000
Hard
Klara Koukalova
#24
2-6 7-5 6-0
Anabel Medina Garrigues
#61
Match data
Jan 31, 2013*
R32
Paris
Premier
→
modern equivalent
WTA 500
Carpet
Anabel Medina Garrigues
#26
6-4 6-1
Klara Koukalova
#45
Match data
Feb 15, 2012*
R64
Qatar Open
Premier 5
→
modern equivalent
WTA 1000
Hard
Anabel Medina Garrigues
#61
6-3 7-5
Klara Koukalova
#34
Match data
Apr 30, 2011*
QF
Estoril
International
→
modern equivalent
WTA 250
Clay
Klara Koukalova
#90
7-5 7-5
Anabel Medina Garrigues
#34
Match data
Mar 4, 2010*
R32
Monterrey Open
International
→
modern equivalent
WTA 250
Hard
Anabel Medina Garrigues
#18
1-6 7-6(1) 6-3
Klara Koukalova
#100
Match data
Apr 30, 2009*
R16
Morocco Open
International
→
modern equivalent
WTA 250
Clay
Anabel Medina Garrigues
#33
7-6(3) 7-5
Klara Koukalova
#55
Match data
May 22, 2008*
R32
Strasbourg Open
Tier III
→
modern equivalent
WTA 250
Clay
Anabel Medina Garrigues
#28
7-6(3) 7-5
Klara Koukalova
#118
Match data
Oct 5, 2006*
R32
Japan Women's Open
Tier III
→
modern equivalent
WTA 250
Hard
Anabel Medina Garrigues
#33
6-4 6-0
Klara Koukalova
#39
Match data
Jul 24, 2005*
F
Palermo
Tier IV
→
modern equivalent
WTA 250
Clay
Klara Koukalova
#76
7-5 3-0 (ret.)
Anabel Medina Garrigues
#58
Match data
Jun 19, 2004*
SF
Libéma Open
Tier III
→
modern equivalent
WTA 250
Grass
Klara Koukalova
#72
7-5 6-4
Anabel Medina Garrigues
#158
Match data
May 14, 2003*
R64
Italian Open
Tier I
→
modern equivalent
WTA 1000
Clay
*
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category.
Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories.
Mapping details.
Career Comparison
Player
Current
Peak
Pts
Elo
W
L
Win %
GS
1000* including documented historical predecessor categories
Finals
500* including documented historical predecessor categories
250* including documented historical predecessor categories
Titles
Klara Koukalova
#566
#20
1,860
1,803
275
288
48.8%
0
0
0
0
3
3
Anabel Medina Garrigues
#741
#16
2,505
1,834
310
278
52.7%
0
0
0
0
11
11
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
Yr W-L Win % Rank Elo GS Titles
Yr W-L Win % Rank Elo GS Titles
17
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
2000
2–5
28.6%
#109
1,495
0
0
18
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
2001
16–20
44.4%
#66
1,562
0
1
19
2001
5–4
55.6%
#139
1,519
0
0
2002
9–3
75.0%
#116
1,687
0
1
20
2002
4–5
44.4%
#117
1,527
0
0
2003
13–12
52.0%
#71
1,613
0
1
21
2003
14–19
42.4%
#63
1,537
0
0
2004
25–23
52.1%
#39
1,708
0
2
22
2004
26–23
53.1%
#46
1,611
0
0
2005
28–23
54.9%
#33
1,744
0
4
23
2005
32–19
62.7%
#35
1,764
0
2
2006
34–24
58.6%
#27
1,689
0
6
24
2006
10–22
31.2%
#117
1,546
0
2
2007
25–22
53.2%
#34
1,682
0
7
25
2007
12–12
50.0%
#63
1,578
0
2
2008
41–25
62.1%
#22
1,819
0
8
26
2008
21–22
48.8%
#72
1,574
0
2
2009
33–26
55.9%
#27
1,683
0
9
27
2009
8–17
32.0%
#90
1,533
0
2
2010
18–25
41.9%
#71
1,567
0
9
28
2010
20–20
50.0%
#41
1,656
0
2
2011
35–21
62.5%
#27
1,783
0
11
29
2011
29–25
53.7%
#41
1,713
0
2
2012
23–26
46.9%
#50
1,618
0
11
30
2012
24–22
52.2%
#28
1,721
0
2
2013
8–19
29.6%
#100
1,541
0
11
31
2013
27–25
51.9%
#35
1,675
0
2
2014
0–4
0.0%
#452
1,491
0
11
32
2014
29–27
51.8%
#40
1,611
0
3
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
33
2015
14–22
38.9%
#99
1,549
0
3
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
34
2016
0–4
0.0%
#400
1,486
0
3
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year.
Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
Yr
Yr
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
17
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
2000
0
2
2
0.0%
2
3
5
40.0%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
18
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
2001
2
6
8
25.0%
14
12
26
53.8%
0
1
1
0.0%
0
1
1
0.0%
19
2001
—
—
—
—
5
3
8
62.5%
—
—
—
—
0
1
1
0.0%
2002
9
3
12
75.0%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
20
2002
0
2
2
0.0%
4
3
7
57.1%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
2003
1
2
3
33.3%
12
10
22
54.5%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
21
2003
3
6
9
33.3%
11
11
22
50.0%
0
1
1
0.0%
0
1
1
0.0%
2004
12
12
24
50.0%
10
8
18
55.6%
3
2
5
60.0%
0
1
1
0.0%
22
2004
8
12
20
40.0%
13
9
22
59.1%
5
2
7
71.4%
—
—
—
—
2005
12
15
27
44.4%
15
5
20
75.0%
1
2
3
33.3%
0
1
1
0.0%
23
2005
16
11
27
59.3%
11
6
17
64.7%
5
1
6
83.3%
0
1
1
0.0%
2006
14
14
28
50.0%
17
7
24
70.8%
2
2
4
50.0%
1
1
2
50.0%
24
2006
4
11
15
26.7%
4
7
11
36.4%
1
3
4
25.0%
1
1
2
50.0%
2007
9
14
23
39.1%
15
5
20
75.0%
0
2
2
0.0%
1
1
2
50.0%
25
2007
5
7
12
41.7%
7
5
12
58.3%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
2008
21
15
36
58.3%
18
7
25
72.0%
2
2
4
50.0%
0
1
1
0.0%
26
2008
6
9
15
40.0%
15
10
25
60.0%
0
2
2
0.0%
0
1
1
0.0%
2009
19
18
37
51.4%
10
5
15
66.7%
4
2
6
66.7%
0
1
1
0.0%
27
2009
1
7
8
12.5%
7
9
16
43.8%
0
1
1
0.0%
—
—
—
—
2010
4
13
17
23.5%
14
10
24
58.3%
0
2
2
0.0%
—
—
—
—
28
2010
12
11
23
52.2%
5
8
13
38.5%
3
1
4
75.0%
—
—
—
—
2011
12
12
24
50.0%
23
8
31
74.2%
0
1
1
0.0%
—
—
—
—
29
2011
16
15
31
51.6%
10
7
17
58.8%
2
2
4
50.0%
1
1
2
50.0%
2012
8
13
21
38.1%
13
9
22
59.1%
2
3
5
40.0%
0
1
1
0.0%
30
2012
8
12
20
40.0%
8
6
14
57.1%
5
3
8
62.5%
3
1
4
75.0%
2013
2
8
10
20.0%
5
8
13
38.5%
1
2
3
33.3%
0
1
1
0.0%
31
2013
17
16
33
51.5%
7
6
13
53.8%
2
2
4
50.0%
1
1
2
50.0%
2014
0
2
2
0.0%
0
2
2
0.0%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
32
2014
18
17
35
51.4%
4
6
10
40.0%
6
3
9
66.7%
1
1
2
50.0%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
33
2015
5
14
19
26.3%
6
5
11
54.5%
3
3
6
50.0%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
34
2016
0
4
4
0.0%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Career
—
119
154
273
43.6%
117
101
218
53.7%
32
24
56
57.1%
7
9
16
43.8%
—
125
149
274
45.6%
168
99
267
62.9%
15
21
36
41.7%
2
9
11
18.2%
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.