H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Klara Koukalova vs Jelena Kostanic Tosic H2H: 2-0
Klara Koukalova holds a 2–0 lead over Jelena Kostanic Tosic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Klara Koukalova leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Klara Koukalova won the 2008 Vina Del Mar fourth round W/O.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 44
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 45
Left-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2008* | Vina Del Mar | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Klara Koukalova | (w/o) | Jelena Kostanic Tosic | Match data |
| Aug 2, 2003* | Sopot | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Klara Koukalova | 6-1 6-0 | Jelena Kostanic Tosic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Klara Koukalova | #566 | #20 | 1,860 | 1,807 | 275 | 285 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Jelena Kostanic Tosic | #937 | #32 | 900 | 1,726 | 112 | 151 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Klara Koukalova | Jelena Kostanic Tosic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #240 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #97 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #114 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #139 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #131 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #117 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #70 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #63 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #66 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #46 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #35 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #35 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #87 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #117 | 1,548 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #51 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #63 | 1,579 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #103 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,590 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #114 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2009 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #90 | 1,537 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2010 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #41 | 1,656 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #830 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2011 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #41 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2012 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #28 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2013 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #35 | 1,679 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2014 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #40 | 1,611 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2015 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #99 | 1,572 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2016 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #400 | 1,499 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |