H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Klara Koukalova vs Jill Craybas H2H: 1-2
Jill Craybas holds a 2–1 lead over Klara Koukalova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Jill Craybas leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jill Craybas won the 2008 Acapulco fourth round 6-1 4-6 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 44
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 52
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 29, 2008* | Acapulco | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Jill Craybas | 6-1 4-6 7-6(2) | Klara Koukalova | Match data |
| Mar 23, 2006* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Jill Craybas | 6-1 6-2 | Klara Koukalova | Match data |
| May 14, 2005* | Prague | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Klara Koukalova | 6-3 6-4 | Jill Craybas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Klara Koukalova | #566 | #20 | 1,860 | 1,807 | 275 | 285 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Jill Craybas | #336 | #39 | 974 | 1,695 | 161 | 256 | 38.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Klara Koukalova | Jill Craybas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2001 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #139 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2002 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #117 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2003 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #63 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #46 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2005 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #35 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #154 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #117 | 1,548 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #63 | 1,579 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,590 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #98 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2009 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #90 | 1,537 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #57 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2010 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #41 | 1,656 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #99 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2011 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #41 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #59 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2012 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #28 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #48 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2013 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #35 | 1,679 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #70 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2014 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #40 | 1,611 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 12–27 | 30.8% | #79 | 1,472 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2015 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #99 | 1,572 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #64 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | 2016 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #400 | 1,499 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #76 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #98 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 6–20 | 23.1% | #150 | 1,442 | 0 | 1 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #189 | 1,449 | 0 | 1 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #336 | 1,451 | 0 | 1 |