H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Klara Koukalova vs Julia Schruff H2H: 1-1
Klara Koukalova and Julia Schruff are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Klara Koukalova leads 1–0 on clay, while Julia Schruff leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Klara Koukalova won the 2007 Prague quarterfinal 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 44
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 43
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2007* | Prague | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Klara Koukalova | 6-3 6-1 | Julia Schruff | Match data |
| Oct 28, 2004* | Linz | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Julia Schruff | 6-4 6-3 | Klara Koukalova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Klara Koukalova | #566 | #20 | 1,860 | 1,807 | 275 | 285 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Julia Schruff | #1,200 | #52 | 536 | 1,665 | 48 | 80 | 37.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Klara Koukalova | Julia Schruff | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2001 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #139 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2002 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #117 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #117 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #63 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #108 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #46 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #81 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #35 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #82 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #117 | 1,548 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #119 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #63 | 1,579 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #132 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,590 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #131 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2009 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #90 | 1,537 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #173 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2010 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #41 | 1,656 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2011 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #41 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2012 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #28 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2013 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #35 | 1,679 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2014 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #40 | 1,611 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2015 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #99 | 1,572 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2016 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #400 | 1,499 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |