H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Klara Koukalova vs Nathalie Dechy H2H: 1-0
Klara Koukalova holds a 1–0 lead over Nathalie Dechy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Klara Koukalova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Klara Koukalova won the 2005 Antwerp third round 7-6(7) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 44
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 47
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2005* | Antwerp | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Klara Koukalova | 7-6(7) 6-4 | Nathalie Dechy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Klara Koukalova | #566 | #20 | 1,860 | 1,807 | 275 | 285 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Nathalie Dechy | #88 | #11 | 1,773 | 1,917 | 291 | 270 | 51.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Klara Koukalova | Nathalie Dechy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #84 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #73 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #139 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #50 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #117 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #25 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #63 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #26 | 1,777 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #46 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #43 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #35 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #20 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #117 | 1,548 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #29 | 1,819 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2007 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #63 | 1,579 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #21 | 1,810 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2008 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,590 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 40–26 | 60.6% | #12 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2009 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #90 | 1,537 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #48 | 1,649 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2010 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #41 | 1,656 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #68 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2011 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #41 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #69 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2012 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #28 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #88 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2013 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #35 | 1,679 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2014 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #40 | 1,611 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2015 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #99 | 1,572 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2016 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #400 | 1,499 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |