H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Klara Koukalova vs Petra Cetkovska H2H: 1-1
Klara Koukalova and Petra Cetkovska are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Klara Koukalova leads 1–0 on grass, while Petra Cetkovska leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Petra Cetkovska won the 2014 US Open first round 6-1 2-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 44
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 41
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2014* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Petra Cetkovska | 6-1 2-6 6-3 | Klara Koukalova | Match data |
| Jun 22, 2012* | Eastbourne | WTA 500 | R16 | Grass | Klara Koukalova | 6-1 1-6 6-2 | Petra Cetkovska | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Klara Koukalova | #566 | #20 | 1,860 | 1,807 | 275 | 285 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Petra Cetkovska | #954 | #25 | 1,955 | 1,761 | 73 | 81 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Klara Koukalova | Petra Cetkovska | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2001 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #139 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2002 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #117 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2003 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #63 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2004 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #46 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #104 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #35 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #83 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #117 | 1,548 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #149 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #63 | 1,579 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #143 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,590 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2009 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #90 | 1,537 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #55 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2010 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #41 | 1,656 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #139 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2011 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #41 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #58 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2012 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #28 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2013 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #35 | 1,679 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #591 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2014 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #40 | 1,611 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2015 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #99 | 1,572 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2016 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #400 | 1,499 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |