H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Klara Koukalova vs Silvija Talaja H2H: 0-1
Silvija Talaja holds a 1–0 lead over Klara Koukalova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Silvija Talaja leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Silvija Talaja won the 2003 Estoril third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 44
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 48
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2003* | Estoril | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Silvija Talaja | 6-4 6-4 | Klara Koukalova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Klara Koukalova | #566 | #20 | 1,860 | 1,807 | 275 | 285 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Silvija Talaja | #1,214 | #18 | 1,376 | 1,811 | 130 | 151 | 46.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Klara Koukalova | Silvija Talaja | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #288 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #251 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #280 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #106 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #139 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #199 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #117 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #85 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #63 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #29 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #46 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #29 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2005 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #35 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2006 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #117 | 1,548 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #74 | 1,559 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2007 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #63 | 1,579 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #93 | 1,547 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2008 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,590 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #114 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2009 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #90 | 1,537 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #190 | 1,507 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2010 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #41 | 1,656 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2011 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #41 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2012 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #28 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2013 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #35 | 1,679 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2014 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #40 | 1,611 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2015 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #99 | 1,572 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2016 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #400 | 1,499 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |