H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kristie Boogert vs Asa Carlsson H2H: 1-2
Asa Carlsson holds a 2–1 lead over Kristie Boogert in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Asa Carlsson leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Asa Carlsson won the 2000 Australian Open second round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 52
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
SWE
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 2000* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Asa Carlsson | 7-5 6-3 | Kristie Boogert | Match data |
| Aug 4, 1995* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Asa Carlsson | 6-2 6-4 | Kristie Boogert | Match data |
| Oct 28, 1993* | Essen | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Kristie Boogert | 6-2 6-0 | Asa Carlsson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kristie Boogert | #564 | #29 | 549 | 1,770 | 104 | 139 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Asa Carlsson | #1,024 | #28 | 831 | 1,816 | 128 | 171 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Kristie Boogert | Asa Carlsson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1991 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #168 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #164 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #111 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #70 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #53 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #49 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #35 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #39 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #55 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #45 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #82 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #92 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #83 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #61 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #94 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 2000 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #66 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 6–21 | 22.2% | #102 | 1,515 | 0 | 1 |
| 2001 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #146 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #78 | 1,571 | 0 | 2 |
| 2002 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #141 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #345 | 1,496 | 0 | 2 |
| 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #314 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #207 | 1,465 | 0 | 2 |