H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Kristie Boogert vs Donna Faber H2H: 1-0

Kristie Boogert holds a 1–0 lead over Donna Faber in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kristie Boogert leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kristie Boogert won the 1993 Roland Garros round of 128 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kristie Boogert
NED Age 52 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Donna Faber
USA Age 55

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kristie Boogert #96 6-4 6-3 Donna Faber #200 Match data May 26, 1993* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kristie Boogert #564 #29 549 1,770 105 140 42.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Donna Faber #227 #55 19 1,718 68 97 41.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kristie Boogert Donna Faber
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1987 1–2 33.3% #218 1,495 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1988 6–9 40.0% #131 1,532 0 0
17 1991 0–4 0.0% #231 1,469 0 0 1989 19–19 50.0% #59 1,674 0 0
18 1992 1–4 20.0% #168 1,450 0 0 1990 15–18 45.5% #84 1,630 0 0
19 1993 8–15 34.8% #111 1,495 0 0 1991 15–19 44.1% #99 1,593 0 0
20 1994 17–18 48.6% #53 1,591 0 0 1992 11–20 35.5% #116 1,541 0 0
21 1995 22–16 57.9% #35 1,751 0 0 1993 1–10 9.1% #227 1,431 0 0
22 1996 13–16 44.8% #55 1,711 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1997 6–10 37.5% #82 1,679 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1998 10–15 40.0% #83 1,614 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 1999 9–12 42.9% #94 1,602 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 2000 12–14 46.2% #66 1,625 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2001 4–11 26.7% #146 1,532 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2002 3–4 42.9% #141 1,538 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2003 0–1 0.0% #314 1,531 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kristie Boogert Donna Faber
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — —
17 1991 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 1989 15 10 25 60.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
18 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 1990 5 7 12 41.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
19 1993 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1991 9 11 20 45.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1994 7 7 14 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 1992 8 12 20 40.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 1995 12 8 20 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1993 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1996 5 5 10 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1997 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1998 1 6 7 14.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1999 1 4 5 20.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2000 6 6 12 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2001 2 4 6 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2002 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 42 51 93 45.2% 27 45 72 37.5% 19 20 39 48.7% 17 24 41 41.5% — 42 53 95 44.2% 19 29 48 39.6% 6 10 16 37.5% 1 5 6 16.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kristie Boogert Donna Faber
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1496 103.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.17 — — — +0.11
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1532 112.2 — — — — +4 +14 — 40.6% -0.63 1–1 1–1 — +0.30
17 1991 1470 105.5 — — — — +28 — — 11.1% -1.89 0–1 — — -0.25 1989 1675 137.0 — — — — +40 -169 -99 48.9% +0.16 7–7 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 100.4 +1.23
18 1992 1451 100.6 — — — — — +76 — 27.3% -1.55 0–1 1–1 — +0.26 1990 1631 115.4 — — — — -7 -19 -43 43.1% -0.68 5–1 (83%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.90
19 1993 1495 122.3 — — — — +35 +34 +66 40.7% -0.55 2–6 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.0 +0.78 1991 1593 109.9 — — — — -20 +38 +10 41.3% -0.77 9–3 (75%) 4–5 (44%) 106.2 +1.62
20 1994 1592 135.8 — — — — +2 -42 +10 51.9% +0.12 3–6 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 99.5 +1.08 1992 1542 119.9 — — — — +26 +37 — 38.0% -0.77 4–5 (44%) 1–4 (20%) 97.6 +0.56
21 1995 1752 145.9 — — — — -20 -150 -154 55.7% +0.67 7–5 (58%) 3–7 (30%) 103.9 -0.03 1993 1432 94.2 — — — — +34 — — 20.0% -2.12 0–3 (0%) 3–2 (60%) 97.5 +0.77
22 1996 1712 132.3 — — — — -27 -121 -11 47.9% -0.10 5–8 (38%) 1–0 — -0.75 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1997 1679 128.2 — — — — +33 -110 0 38.9% -0.78 4–4 (50%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1998 1614 117.4 — — — — -22 -70 +161 47.4% +0.19 4–7 (36%) 1–3 (25%) 94.5 -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1999 1603 113.2 — — — — -45 -59 +158 44.7% -0.30 2–3 (40%) 8–2 (80%) 105.0 -0.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2000 1625 123.8 — — — — -9 -63 +115 47.5% -0.33 4–5 (44%) 1–3 (25%) 99.6 -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2001 1533 108.3 — — — — +60 -52 +187 38.7% -0.71 1–4 (20%) 0–1 — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2002 1538 108.4 — — — — +61 -69 — 46.7% -0.13 0–1 0–1 — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2003 1532 103.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1770 133.9 — — — — +1 -62 +68 46.4% -0.14 32–52 (38%) 20–24 (45%) 96.0 -0.23 — 1719 121.4 — — — — +14 -11 -44 41.2% -0.60 26–20 (57%) 13–17 (43%) 103.5 +3.33

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.