H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Kristie Boogert vs Els Callens H2H: 0-1

Els Callens holds a 1–0 lead over Kristie Boogert in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Els Callens leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Els Callens won the 1996 Leipzig round of 32 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kristie Boogert
NED Age 52 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Els Callens
BEL Age 56 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Els Callens #86 6-4 6-4 Kristie Boogert #53 Match data Oct 3, 1996* R32 Leipzig Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kristie Boogert #564 #29 549 1,770 105 140 42.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Els Callens #473 #43 582 1,715 83 128 39.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kristie Boogert Els Callens
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1991 0–4 0.0% #231 1,469 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1992 1–4 20.0% #168 1,450 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1993 8–15 34.8% #111 1,495 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1994 17–18 48.6% #53 1,591 0 0 1991 1–1 50.0% #168 1,509 0 0
21 1995 22–16 57.9% #35 1,751 0 0 1992 0–1 0.0% #231 1,492 0 0
22 1996 13–16 44.8% #55 1,711 0 0 1993 2–1 66.7% #188 1,513 0 0
23 1997 6–10 37.5% #82 1,679 0 0 1994 4–3 57.1% #110 1,560 0 0
24 1998 10–15 40.0% #83 1,614 0 0 1995 8–11 42.1% #95 1,551 0 0
25 1999 9–12 42.9% #94 1,602 0 0 1996 13–12 52.0% #51 1,692 0 0
26 2000 12–14 46.2% #66 1,625 0 0 1997 8–16 33.3% #98 1,579 0 0
27 2001 4–11 26.7% #146 1,532 0 0 1998 2–8 20.0% #102 1,525 0 0
28 2002 3–4 42.9% #141 1,538 0 0 1999 7–9 43.8% #82 1,569 0 0
29 2003 0–1 0.0% #314 1,531 0 0 2000 8–13 38.1% #100 1,564 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2001 2–6 25.0% #177 1,522 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2002 9–10 47.4% #67 1,606 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2003 13–19 40.6% #73 1,637 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2004 5–15 25.0% #122 1,539 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2005 1–3 25.0% #224 1,521 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kristie Boogert Els Callens
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1991 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 7 7 14 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 1991 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 1995 12 8 20 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1992 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1996 5 5 10 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 1993 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
23 1997 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 1994 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
24 1998 1 6 7 14.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 1 4 5 20.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
25 1999 1 4 5 20.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1996 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6%
26 2000 6 6 12 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1997 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
27 2001 2 4 6 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1998 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 2002 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1999 1 4 5 20.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
29 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2000 5 6 11 45.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 4 7 11 36.4% 1 6 7 14.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 3 9 12 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 42 51 93 45.2% 27 45 72 37.5% 19 20 39 48.7% 17 24 41 41.5% — 26 49 75 34.7% 15 29 44 34.1% 19 23 42 45.2% 23 27 50 46.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kristie Boogert Els Callens
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1991 1470 105.5 — — — — +28 — — 11.1% -1.89 0–1 — — -0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1992 1451 100.6 — — — — — +76 — 27.3% -1.55 0–1 1–1 — +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 1495 122.3 — — — — +35 +34 +66 40.7% -0.55 2–6 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.0 +0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 1592 135.8 — — — — +2 -42 +10 51.9% +0.12 3–6 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 99.5 +1.08 1991 1509 97.7 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 1–1 — +0.24
21 1995 1752 145.9 — — — — -20 -150 -154 55.7% +0.67 7–5 (58%) 3–7 (30%) 103.9 -0.03 1992 1493 94.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.06
22 1996 1712 132.3 — — — — -27 -121 -11 47.9% -0.10 5–8 (38%) 1–0 — -0.75 1993 1514 102.8 — — — — +47 — — 57.1% +0.14 1–0 — — +0.46
23 1997 1679 128.2 — — — — +33 -110 0 38.9% -0.78 4–4 (50%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.78 1994 1561 113.2 — — — — +25 — — 56.3% +0.63 1–1 1–0 — -0.16
24 1998 1614 117.4 — — — — -22 -70 +161 47.4% +0.19 4–7 (36%) 1–3 (25%) 94.5 -0.21 1995 1551 116.0 — — — — -68 +43 +105 45.2% -0.24 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.58
25 1999 1603 113.2 — — — — -45 -59 +158 44.7% -0.30 2–3 (40%) 8–2 (80%) 105.0 -0.49 1996 1692 128.2 — — — — -52 -110 +3 48.1% -0.30 4–2 (67%) 4–4 (50%) 103.8 +0.50
26 2000 1625 123.8 — — — — -9 -63 +115 47.5% -0.33 4–5 (44%) 1–3 (25%) 99.6 -0.14 1997 1579 109.4 — — — — +17 -21 +72 33.3% -1.26 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.4 +0.32
27 2001 1533 108.3 — — — — +60 -52 +187 38.7% -0.71 1–4 (20%) 0–1 — +0.09 1998 1525 102.8 — — — — +21 — — 34.8% -1.00 1–4 (20%) 1–1 — +0.31
28 2002 1538 108.4 — — — — +61 -69 — 46.7% -0.13 0–1 0–1 — 0.00 1999 1570 122.3 — — — — -17 +45 — 44.4% -0.08 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.02
29 2003 1532 103.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — -0.12 2000 1565 124.4 — — — — +8 +10 -5 44.9% -0.06 1–6 (14%) 2–4 (33%) 93.3 -0.24
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1523 118.1 — — — — +25 +26 — 33.3% -0.72 0–2 0–2 — -0.05
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1606 123.2 — — — — +7 -75 -6 42.6% -0.40 7–2 (78%) 2–3 (40%) 105.1 -0.33
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1637 127.2 -0.92 -1.45 0.759 44.5% +8 -178 +36 41.1% -0.48 5–4 (56%) 4–3 (57%) 102.9 -1.93
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1539 102.6 -1.13 -2.60 0.779 44.6% +15 -107 +61 33.3% -1.44 2–6 (25%) 3–1 (75%) 97.1 -0.15
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1522 96.0 -1.14 -3.36 0.793 46.2% +16 — — 25.0% -1.88 — 1–1 — +0.11
Career — 1770 133.9 — — — — +1 -62 +68 46.4% -0.14 32–52 (38%) 20–24 (45%) 96.0 -0.23 — 1716 123.9 -1.05 -2.22 0.772 44.7% -2 -39 +39 41.1% -0.57 30–36 (45%) 22–25 (47%) 98.5 -0.12

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.