H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kristie Boogert vs Florencia Labat H2H: 0-1
Florencia Labat holds a 1–0 lead over Kristie Boogert in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Florencia Labat leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Florencia Labat won the 1997 Roland Garros first round 7-5 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 52
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 55
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 1997* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Florencia Labat | 7-5 6-0 | Kristie Boogert | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kristie Boogert | #564 | #29 | 549 | 1,770 | 104 | 139 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Florencia Labat | #106 | #26 | 733 | 1,875 | 190 | 181 | 51.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kristie Boogert | Florencia Labat | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1991 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #168 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #111 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #53 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #60 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #35 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #52 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #55 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #51 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #82 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #38 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #83 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #55 | 1,783 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #94 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #42 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #66 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #39 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2001 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #146 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #64 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2002 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #141 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #314 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #106 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |