H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Kristie Boogert vs Kimiko Date Krumm H2H: 0-2

Kimiko Date Krumm holds a 2–0 lead over Kristie Boogert in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kimiko Date Krumm leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kimiko Date Krumm won the 1996 Wimbledon third round 2-6 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kristie Boogert
NED Age 52 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Kimiko Date Krumm
Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 30, 1996* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Kimiko Date Krumm 2-6 6-4 6-2 Kristie Boogert #51 Match data
Mar 21, 1995* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R16 Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 7-6 6-1 Kristie Boogert #70 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kristie Boogert #564 #29 549 1,770 104 139 42.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Kimiko Date Krumm — — — 2,091 241 188 56.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kristie Boogert Kimiko Date Krumm
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1991 0–4 0.0% #231 1,469 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1992 1–4 20.0% #168 1,450 0 0 1989 6–5 54.5% — 1,562 0 0
19 1993 8–15 34.8% #111 1,494 0 0 1990 10–7 58.8% — 1,664 0 0
20 1994 17–18 48.6% #53 1,591 0 0 1991 12–11 52.2% — 1,725 0 0
21 1995 22–16 57.9% #35 1,751 0 0 1992 26–13 66.7% — 1,867 0 1
22 1996 13–16 44.8% #55 1,713 0 0 1993 25–11 69.4% — 1,956 0 2
23 1997 6–10 37.5% #82 1,680 0 0 1994 32–12 72.7% — 1,987 0 4
24 1998 10–15 40.0% #83 1,615 0 0 1995 39–12 76.5% — 2,029 0 5
25 1999 9–12 42.9% #94 1,604 0 0 1996 31–13 70.5% — 2,071 0 7
26 2000 11–13 45.8% #66 1,623 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2001 4–11 26.7% #146 1,531 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2002 3–4 42.9% #141 1,537 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2003 0–1 0.0% #314 1,531 0 0 — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% — 2,042 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2009 6–11 35.3% — 1,841 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2010 19–18 51.4% — 1,814 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2011 7–24 22.6% — 1,567 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2012 2–14 12.5% — 1,454 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2013 12–15 44.4% — 1,575 0 8
43 — — — — — — — 2014 11–14 44.0% — 1,597 0 8
44 — — — — — — — 2015 3–6 33.3% — 1,574 0 8
46 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% — 1,564 0 8