H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Kristie Boogert vs Laura Arraya H2H: 0-1
Laura Arraya holds a 1–0 lead over Kristie Boogert in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Laura Arraya leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Laura Arraya won the 1991 Westchester third round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 52
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
PER
Age 62
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 1991* | Westchester | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Laura Arraya | 6-4 7-5 | Kristie Boogert | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kristie Boogert | #564 | #29 | 549 | 1,770 | 104 | 139 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Laura Arraya | #192 | #14 | 51 | 1,922 | 270 | 204 | 57.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kristie Boogert | Laura Arraya | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1991 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 19–8 | 70.4% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #168 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 33–17 | 66.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 7 |
| 19 | 1993 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #111 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 23–23 | 50.0% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 7 |
| 20 | 1994 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #53 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #34 | 1,760 | 0 | 8 |
| 21 | 1995 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #35 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #63 | 1,693 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | 1996 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #55 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #33 | 1,718 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 1997 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #82 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #45 | 1,770 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 1998 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #83 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1999 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #94 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 27–12 | 69.2% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 2000 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #66 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #21 | 1,821 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | 2001 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #146 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,823 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 2002 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #141 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #45 | 1,734 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #314 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #71 | 1,683 | 0 | 10 |