H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kristie Boogert vs Laurence Courtois H2H: 0-1
Laurence Courtois holds a 1–0 lead over Kristie Boogert in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Laurence Courtois leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Laurence Courtois won the 2000 Estoril third round 6-0 3-6 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 52
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 50
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2000* | Estoril | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Laurence Courtois | 6-0 3-6 7-6(5) | Kristie Boogert | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kristie Boogert | #564 | #29 | 549 | 1,770 | 104 | 139 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Laurence Courtois | #484 | #37 | 565 | 1,719 | 74 | 93 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kristie Boogert | Laurence Courtois | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1991 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #104 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #168 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #105 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #111 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #53 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #44 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #35 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #183 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #55 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #125 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #82 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #78 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #83 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #130 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #94 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #166 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #66 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2001 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #146 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2002 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #141 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #314 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |