H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kristie Boogert vs Louise Field H2H: 1-0
Kristie Boogert holds a 1–0 lead over Louise Field in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kristie Boogert leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Kristie Boogert won the 1994 Osaka third round 6-0 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 52
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 59
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 1994* | Osaka | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Kristie Boogert | 6-0 6-0 | Louise Field | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kristie Boogert | #564 | #29 | 549 | 1,770 | 104 | 139 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Louise Field | #752 | #96 | 12 | 1,579 | 58 | 121 | 32.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kristie Boogert | Louise Field | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1991 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #168 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #106 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #111 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #157 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #53 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #113 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #35 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #163 | 1,421 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #55 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #100 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #82 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #125 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #83 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #193 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #94 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #170 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #66 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #175 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2001 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #146 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #197 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2002 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #141 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #314 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |