H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Kristie Boogert vs Miho Saeki H2H: 1-0
Kristie Boogert holds a 1–0 lead over Miho Saeki in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kristie Boogert leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Kristie Boogert won the 1998 Wimbledon first round 3-6 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 52
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 50
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 1998* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Kristie Boogert | 3-6 6-2 6-1 | Miho Saeki | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kristie Boogert | #564 | #29 | 549 | 1,770 | 104 | 139 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Miho Saeki | #884 | #56 | 461 | 1,579 | 26 | 57 | 31.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kristie Boogert | Miho Saeki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1991 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #168 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1993 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #111 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #234 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #53 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #120 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #35 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #76 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #55 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #89 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #82 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #119 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #83 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1999 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #94 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #179 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #66 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #201 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2001 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #146 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #256 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2002 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #141 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #314 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |