H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Kristie Boogert vs Nancy Feber H2H: 1-0

Kristie Boogert holds a 1–0 lead over Nancy Feber in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kristie Boogert leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kristie Boogert won the 1996 Australian Open round of 64 6-2 1-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kristie Boogert
NED Age 52 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Nancy Feber
BEL Age 50 Left-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kristie Boogert #33 6-2 1-6 6-3 Nancy Feber #95 Match data Jan 19, 1996* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kristie Boogert #564 #29 549 1,770 105 140 42.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nancy Feber #589 #79 219 1,566 25 47 34.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kristie Boogert Nancy Feber
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1992 1–1 50.0% #165 1,502 0 0
17 1991 0–4 0.0% #231 1,469 0 0 1993 3–9 25.0% #152 1,486 0 0
18 1992 1–4 20.0% #168 1,450 0 0 1994 4–9 30.8% #124 1,482 0 0
19 1993 8–15 34.8% #111 1,495 0 0 1995 9–12 42.9% #101 1,549 0 0
20 1994 17–18 48.6% #53 1,591 0 0 1996 6–12 33.3% #109 1,513 0 0
21 1995 22–16 57.9% #35 1,751 0 0 1997 2–4 33.3% #177 1,516 0 0
22 1996 13–16 44.8% #55 1,711 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1997 6–10 37.5% #82 1,679 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1998 10–15 40.0% #83 1,614 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 1999 9–12 42.9% #94 1,602 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 2000 12–14 46.2% #66 1,625 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2001 4–11 26.7% #146 1,532 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2002 3–4 42.9% #141 1,538 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2003 0–1 0.0% #314 1,531 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kristie Boogert Nancy Feber
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1991 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 1993 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
18 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 1994 1 5 6 16.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1993 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1995 3 7 10 30.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1994 7 7 14 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 1996 2 7 9 22.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1995 12 8 20 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1997 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 1996 5 5 10 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1997 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1998 1 6 7 14.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1999 1 4 5 20.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2000 6 6 12 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2001 2 4 6 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2002 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 42 51 93 45.2% 27 45 72 37.5% 19 20 39 48.7% 17 24 41 41.5% — 10 24 34 29.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 9 11 20 45.0% 2 6 8 25.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kristie Boogert Nancy Feber
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1502 100.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — +0.25
17 1991 1470 105.5 — — — — +28 — — 11.1% -1.89 0–1 — — -0.25 1993 1487 111.8 — — — — +51 — — 26.9% -1.54 1–1 — — -0.06
18 1992 1451 100.6 — — — — — +76 — 27.3% -1.55 0–1 1–1 — +0.26 1994 1483 105.3 — — — — -15 — +102 36.7% -0.73 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.24
19 1993 1495 122.3 — — — — +35 +34 +66 40.7% -0.55 2–6 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.0 +0.78 1995 1550 117.2 — — — — -78 — +71 45.8% -0.15 2–4 (33%) 1–1 — +0.43
20 1994 1592 135.8 — — — — +2 -42 +10 51.9% +0.12 3–6 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 99.5 +1.08 1996 1513 113.7 — — — — -89 — +173 45.5% -0.27 0–8 (0%) 4–0 (100%) 95.3 +1.75
21 1995 1752 145.9 — — — — -20 -150 -154 55.7% +0.67 7–5 (58%) 3–7 (30%) 103.9 -0.03 1997 1516 106.1 — — — — -48 — — 40.0% -0.70 — 2–2 (50%) — +0.12
22 1996 1712 132.3 — — — — -27 -121 -11 47.9% -0.10 5–8 (38%) 1–0 — -0.75 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1997 1679 128.2 — — — — +33 -110 0 38.9% -0.78 4–4 (50%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1998 1614 117.4 — — — — -22 -70 +161 47.4% +0.19 4–7 (36%) 1–3 (25%) 94.5 -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1999 1603 113.2 — — — — -45 -59 +158 44.7% -0.30 2–3 (40%) 8–2 (80%) 105.0 -0.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2000 1625 123.8 — — — — -9 -63 +115 47.5% -0.33 4–5 (44%) 1–3 (25%) 99.6 -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2001 1533 108.3 — — — — +60 -52 +187 38.7% -0.71 1–4 (20%) 0–1 — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2002 1538 108.4 — — — — +61 -69 — 46.7% -0.13 0–1 0–1 — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2003 1532 103.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1770 133.9 — — — — +1 -62 +68 46.4% -0.14 32–52 (38%) 20–24 (45%) 96.0 -0.23 — 1567 115.2 — — — — -40 — +114 40.7% -0.55 4–16 (20%) 7–4 (64%) 94.3 +3.85

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.