H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Kristie Boogert vs Naoko Sawamatsu H2H: 0-1
Naoko Sawamatsu holds a 1–0 lead over Kristie Boogert in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Naoko Sawamatsu leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Naoko Sawamatsu won the 1994 Rome third round 4-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 52
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 53
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 1994* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Naoko Sawamatsu | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | Kristie Boogert | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kristie Boogert | #564 | #29 | 549 | 1,770 | 104 | 139 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Naoko Sawamatsu | #266 | #14 | 881 | 1,971 | 182 | 127 | 58.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kristie Boogert | Naoko Sawamatsu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #262 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1991 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 14–6 | 70.0% | #31 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #168 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #33 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1993 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #111 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #24 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1994 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #53 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #28 | 1,855 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1995 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #35 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 24–12 | 66.7% | #26 | 1,872 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1996 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #55 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #17 | 1,848 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1997 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #82 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #38 | 1,807 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1998 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #83 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #34 | 1,847 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1999 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #94 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #55 | 1,720 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2000 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #66 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2001 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #146 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2002 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #141 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #314 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |