H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Kristie Boogert vs Noelle Van Lottum H2H: 0-1

Noelle Van Lottum holds a 1–0 lead over Kristie Boogert in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Noelle Van Lottum leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Noelle Van Lottum won the 1992 Prague Open round of 16 2-6 7-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kristie Boogert
NED Age 52 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Noelle Van Lottum
FRA Age 54

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Noelle Van Lottum 2-6 7-6 6-4 Kristie Boogert #181 Match data Jul 24, 1992* R16 Prague Open Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kristie Boogert #564 #29 549 1,770 105 140 42.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Noelle Van Lottum — — — 1,646 56 96 36.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kristie Boogert Noelle Van Lottum
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1988 1–1 50.0% — 1,506 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1989 3–2 60.0% — 1,533 0 0
17 1991 0–4 0.0% #231 1,469 0 0 1990 3–2 60.0% — 1,580 0 0
18 1992 1–4 20.0% #168 1,450 0 0 1991 8–15 34.8% — 1,531 0 0
19 1993 8–15 34.8% #111 1,495 0 0 1992 17–20 45.9% — 1,610 0 1
20 1994 17–18 48.6% #53 1,591 0 0 1993 13–21 38.2% — 1,582 0 1
21 1995 22–16 57.9% #35 1,751 0 0 1994 7–12 36.8% — 1,575 0 1
22 1996 13–16 44.8% #55 1,711 0 0 1995 1–9 10.0% — 1,465 0 1
23 1997 6–10 37.5% #82 1,679 0 0 1996 0–2 0.0% — 1,441 0 1
24 1998 10–15 40.0% #83 1,614 0 0 1997 2–9 18.2% — 1,426 0 1
25 1999 9–12 42.9% #94 1,602 0 0 1998 1–2 33.3% — 1,428 0 1
26 2000 12–14 46.2% #66 1,625 0 0 1999 0–1 0.0% — 1,416 0 1
27 2001 4–11 26.7% #146 1,532 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2002 3–4 42.9% #141 1,538 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2003 0–1 0.0% #314 1,531 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kristie Boogert Noelle Van Lottum
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0%
18 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1993 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1992 10 9 19 52.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
20 1994 7 7 14 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 1993 5 9 14 35.7% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
21 1995 12 8 20 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1994 3 6 9 33.3% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1996 5 5 10 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 1995 1 5 6 16.7% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1997 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 1996 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1998 1 6 7 14.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
25 1999 1 4 5 20.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1998 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
26 2000 6 6 12 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1999 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2001 2 4 6 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2002 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 42 51 93 45.2% 27 45 72 37.5% 19 20 39 48.7% 17 24 41 41.5% — 25 41 66 37.9% 22 40 62 35.5% 0 8 8 0.0% 9 7 16 56.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kristie Boogert Noelle Van Lottum
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1507 102.1 — — — — — — — 60.0% +0.60 0–1 — — +0.28
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1533 105.7 — — — — +43 — — 53.3% +0.07 3–2 (60%) 0–1 — +0.90
17 1991 1470 105.5 — — — — +28 — — 11.1% -1.89 0–1 — — -0.25 1990 1581 116.6 — — — — +44 — — 60.0% -0.10 — 1–0 — +0.14
18 1992 1451 100.6 — — — — — +76 — 27.3% -1.55 0–1 1–1 — +0.26 1991 1532 111.1 — — — — +43 +16 — 38.8% -0.80 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.26
19 1993 1495 122.3 — — — — +35 +34 +66 40.7% -0.55 2–6 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.0 +0.78 1992 1610 125.2 — — — — +39 -43 — 48.1% -0.30 3–4 (43%) 5–1 (83%) 101.6 +1.96
20 1994 1592 135.8 — — — — +2 -42 +10 51.9% +0.12 3–6 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 99.5 +1.08 1993 1583 123.6 — — — — +35 -30 — 40.7% -0.57 6–9 (40%) 2–6 (25%) 96.9 +0.33
21 1995 1752 145.9 — — — — -20 -150 -154 55.7% +0.67 7–5 (58%) 3–7 (30%) 103.9 -0.03 1994 1576 110.9 — — — — +14 +11 — 40.0% -1.15 4–2 (67%) — — -0.09
22 1996 1712 132.3 — — — — -27 -121 -11 47.9% -0.10 5–8 (38%) 1–0 — -0.75 1995 1465 92.1 — — — — +55 +58 — 11.1% -3.06 0–2 2–0 — +0.63
23 1997 1679 128.2 — — — — +33 -110 0 38.9% -0.78 4–4 (50%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.78 1996 1442 96.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.80 0–1 — — +0.13
24 1998 1614 117.4 — — — — -22 -70 +161 47.4% +0.19 4–7 (36%) 1–3 (25%) 94.5 -0.21 1997 1427 107.1 — — — — +69 +66 +36 26.9% -1.35 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.01
25 1999 1603 113.2 — — — — -45 -59 +158 44.7% -0.30 2–3 (40%) 8–2 (80%) 105.0 -0.49 1998 1429 97.9 — — — — — +33 — 44.4% -0.78 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.19
26 2000 1625 123.8 — — — — -9 -63 +115 47.5% -0.33 4–5 (44%) 1–3 (25%) 99.6 -0.14 1999 1416 — — — — — — — — — — — — — +0.09
27 2001 1533 108.3 — — — — +60 -52 +187 38.7% -0.71 1–4 (20%) 0–1 — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2002 1538 108.4 — — — — +61 -69 — 46.7% -0.13 0–1 0–1 — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2003 1532 103.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1770 133.9 — — — — +1 -62 +68 46.4% -0.14 32–52 (38%) 20–24 (45%) 96.0 -0.23 — 1646 119.1 — — — — +39 -1 +36 40.7% -0.78 20–29 (41%) 12–11 (52%) 99.0 +3.20

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.