H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Kristie Boogert vs Rosalyn Fairbank H2H: 0-1

Rosalyn Fairbank holds a 1–0 lead over Kristie Boogert in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Rosalyn Fairbank leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Rosalyn Fairbank won the 1993 Birmingham second round 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kristie Boogert
NED Age 52 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Rosalyn Fairbank
USA Age 65 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 9, 1993* Birmingham WTA 250 R64 Grass Rosalyn Fairbank #52 6-2 6-4 Kristie Boogert #92 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kristie Boogert #564 #29 549 1,770 104 139 42.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rosalyn Fairbank #325 #15 51 1,933 336 309 52.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kristie Boogert Rosalyn Fairbank
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1991 0–4 0.0% #231 1,469 0 0 1978 3–2 60.0% — 1,525 0 0
18 1992 1–4 20.0% #168 1,450 0 0 1979 17–10 63.0% — 1,720 0 0
19 1993 8–15 34.8% #111 1,494 0 0 1980 22–20 52.4% — 1,681 0 0
20 1994 17–18 48.6% #53 1,591 0 0 1981 15–22 40.5% — 1,657 0 0
21 1995 22–16 57.9% #35 1,751 0 0 1982 32–21 60.4% — 1,904 0 0
22 1996 13–16 44.8% #55 1,713 0 0 1983 24–19 55.8% — 1,920 0 1
23 1997 6–10 37.5% #82 1,680 0 0 1984 22–26 45.8% #32 1,767 0 1
24 1998 10–15 40.0% #83 1,615 0 0 1985 28–23 54.9% #38 1,806 0 1
25 1999 9–12 42.9% #94 1,604 0 0 1986 23–20 53.5% #28 1,824 0 1
26 2000 11–13 45.8% #66 1,623 0 0 1987 21–20 51.2% #36 1,756 0 1
27 2001 4–11 26.7% #146 1,531 0 0 1988 27–22 55.1% #37 1,775 0 1
28 2002 3–4 42.9% #141 1,537 0 0 1989 27–18 60.0% #22 1,846 0 1
29 2003 0–1 0.0% #314 1,531 0 0 1990 26–20 56.5% #24 1,789 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 1991 14–19 42.4% #90 1,637 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 1992 16–16 50.0% #46 1,728 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 1993 17–19 47.2% #63 1,766 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 1994 0–4 0.0% #284 1,704 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 1995 2–8 20.0% #261 1,599 0 1