H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Kristie Boogert vs Steffi Graf H2H: 0-3

Steffi Graf holds a 3–0 lead over Kristie Boogert in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Steffi Graf leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Steffi Graf won the 1998 Birmingham fourth round 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kristie Boogert
NED Age 52 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main draw meetings
Steffi Graf
GER Age 57 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 12, 1998* Birmingham WTA 250 R16 Grass Steffi Graf #60 6-2 6-4 Kristie Boogert #95 Match data
Jul 2, 1995* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Steffi Graf #1 6-1 6-0 Kristie Boogert #58 Match data
Feb 5, 1994* Tokyo Pan Pacific WTA 1000 SF Carpet Steffi Graf #1 6-2 6-2 Kristie Boogert #90 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kristie Boogert #564 #29 549 1,770 104 139 42.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Steffi Graf #3 #1 5,028 2,600 866 109 88.8% 22 17 5 12 50 106

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kristie Boogert Steffi Graf
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
12 — — — — — — — 1981 1–1 50.0% — 1,502 0 0
13 — — — — — — — 1982 2–4 33.3% — 1,507 0 0
14 — — — — — — — 1983 6–7 46.2% — 1,546 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1984 17–13 56.7% #22 1,747 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1985 40–13 75.5% #6 2,037 0 0
17 1991 0–4 0.0% #231 1,469 0 0 1986 63–6 91.3% #3 2,329 0 8
18 1992 1–4 20.0% #168 1,450 0 0 1987 70–2 97.2% #1 2,505 1 19
19 1993 8–15 34.8% #111 1,494 0 0 1988 68–3 95.8% #1 2,535 5 29
20 1994 17–18 48.6% #53 1,591 0 0 1989 85–2 97.7% #1 2,584 8 43
21 1995 22–16 57.9% #35 1,751 0 0 1990 72–5 93.5% #1 2,510 9 53
22 1996 13–16 44.8% #55 1,713 0 0 1991 64–8 88.9% #2 2,418 10 60
23 1997 6–10 37.5% #82 1,680 0 0 1992 61–6 91.0% #2 2,448 11 68
24 1998 10–15 40.0% #83 1,615 0 0 1993 77–5 93.9% #1 2,510 14 78
25 1999 9–12 42.9% #94 1,604 0 0 1994 58–6 90.6% #1 2,417 15 85
26 2000 11–13 45.8% #66 1,623 0 0 1995 48–2 96.0% #1 2,466 18 94
27 2001 4–11 26.7% #146 1,531 0 0 1996 51–4 92.7% #1 2,446 21 101
28 2002 3–4 42.9% #141 1,537 0 0 1997 16–4 80.0% #28 2,353 21 102
29 2003 0–1 0.0% #314 1,531 0 0 1998 33–9 78.6% #9 2,284 21 105
30 — — — — — — — 1999 34–9 79.1% #3 2,242 22 106