H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Kristie Boogert vs Tami Whitlinger Jones H2H: 0-1

Tami Whitlinger Jones holds a 1–0 lead over Kristie Boogert in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tami Whitlinger Jones leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tami Whitlinger Jones won the 1997 Indian Wells Open round of 64 5-7 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kristie Boogert
NED Age 52 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Tami Whitlinger Jones
USA Age 57

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tami Whitlinger Jones 5-7 6-4 6-3 Kristie Boogert #41 Match data Mar 12, 1997* R64 Indian Wells Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kristie Boogert #564 #29 549 1,770 105 140 42.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tami Whitlinger Jones — — — 1,777 106 135 44.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kristie Boogert Tami Whitlinger Jones
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1991 0–4 0.0% #231 1,469 0 0 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0
18 1992 1–4 20.0% #168 1,450 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1993 8–15 34.8% #111 1,495 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1994 17–18 48.6% #53 1,591 0 0 1989 4–5 44.4% — 1,525 0 0
21 1995 22–16 57.9% #35 1,751 0 0 1990 12–16 42.9% — 1,576 0 0
22 1996 13–16 44.8% #55 1,711 0 0 1991 17–18 48.6% — 1,682 0 0
23 1997 6–10 37.5% #82 1,679 0 0 1992 13–16 44.8% — 1,644 0 0
24 1998 10–15 40.0% #83 1,614 0 0 1993 13–19 40.6% — 1,650 0 0
25 1999 9–12 42.9% #94 1,602 0 0 1994 16–18 47.1% — 1,709 0 0
26 2000 12–14 46.2% #66 1,625 0 0 1995 19–18 51.4% — 1,700 0 0
27 2001 4–11 26.7% #146 1,532 0 0 1996 10–13 43.5% — 1,694 0 0
28 2002 3–4 42.9% #141 1,538 0 0 1997 2–11 15.4% — 1,596 0 0
29 2003 0–1 0.0% #314 1,531 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kristie Boogert Tami Whitlinger Jones
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1991 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 7 7 14 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 1989 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1995 12 8 20 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1990 8 8 16 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
22 1996 5 5 10 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 1991 4 8 12 33.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 1997 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 1992 10 9 19 52.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1998 1 6 7 14.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 11 10 21 52.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
25 1999 1 4 5 20.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1994 13 12 25 52.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
26 2000 6 6 12 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1995 8 9 17 47.1% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 2001 2 4 6 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1996 4 6 10 40.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
28 2002 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1997 1 5 6 16.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 42 51 93 45.2% 27 45 72 37.5% 19 20 39 48.7% 17 24 41 41.5% — 63 73 136 46.3% 24 35 59 40.7% 7 12 19 36.8% 12 15 27 44.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kristie Boogert Tami Whitlinger Jones
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1991 1470 105.5 — — — — +28 — — 11.1% -1.89 0–1 — — -0.25 1986 1494 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.05
18 1992 1451 100.6 — — — — — +76 — 27.3% -1.55 0–1 1–1 — +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 1495 122.3 — — — — +35 +34 +66 40.7% -0.55 2–6 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.0 +0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 1592 135.8 — — — — +2 -42 +10 51.9% +0.12 3–6 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 99.5 +1.08 1989 1525 121.7 — — — — +38 — — 52.4% +0.24 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 96.3 +0.49
21 1995 1752 145.9 — — — — -20 -150 -154 55.7% +0.67 7–5 (58%) 3–7 (30%) 103.9 -0.03 1990 1577 126.7 — — — — +71 -98 — 43.9% -0.17 5–5 (50%) 1–6 (14%) 96.8 +0.78
22 1996 1712 132.3 — — — — -27 -121 -11 47.9% -0.10 5–8 (38%) 1–0 — -0.75 1991 1682 133.2 — — — — -51 -22 -78 49.4% -0.26 6–7 (46%) 8–2 (80%) 106.6 -0.08
23 1997 1679 128.2 — — — — +33 -110 0 38.9% -0.78 4–4 (50%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.78 1992 1645 120.9 — — — — +15 -10 — 41.0% -0.59 4–1 (80%) 2–3 (40%) 102.8 -0.65
24 1998 1614 117.4 — — — — -22 -70 +161 47.4% +0.19 4–7 (36%) 1–3 (25%) 94.5 -0.21 1993 1651 135.8 — — — — +45 -78 -87 41.7% -0.75 4–6 (40%) 4–4 (50%) 99.7 -1.72
25 1999 1603 113.2 — — — — -45 -59 +158 44.7% -0.30 2–3 (40%) 8–2 (80%) 105.0 -0.49 1994 1709 145.5 — — — — +28 — — 45.8% -0.15 3–5 (38%) 1–5 (17%) 97.5 -1.10
26 2000 1625 123.8 — — — — -9 -63 +115 47.5% -0.33 4–5 (44%) 1–3 (25%) 99.6 -0.14 1995 1701 136.6 — — — — -14 -37 -134 53.8% +0.30 6–11 (35%) 6–4 (60%) 96.8 -1.16
27 2001 1533 108.3 — — — — +60 -52 +187 38.7% -0.71 1–4 (20%) 0–1 — +0.09 1996 1694 132.0 — — — — +28 -56 — 42.3% -0.48 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 103.6 -0.18
28 2002 1538 108.4 — — — — +61 -69 — 46.7% -0.13 0–1 0–1 — 0.00 1997 1596 120.8 — — — — +84 -20 — 25.8% -1.55 1–4 (20%) 0–3 (0%) 93.1 -0.98
29 2003 1532 103.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1770 133.9 — — — — +1 -62 +68 46.4% -0.14 32–52 (38%) 20–24 (45%) 96.0 -0.23 — 1778 139.7 — — — — +23 -42 -104 45.0% -0.32 33–44 (43%) 25–32 (44%) 97.2 -1.94

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.