H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Kristie Boogert vs Yayuk Basuki H2H: 0-2
Yayuk Basuki holds a 2–0 lead over Kristie Boogert in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Yayuk Basuki leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yayuk Basuki won the 1998 Australian Open second round 5-7 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 52
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
INA
Age 55
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 1998* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Yayuk Basuki | 5-7 6-4 6-3 | Kristie Boogert | Match data |
| May 1, 1993* | Jakarta | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Yayuk Basuki | 6-2 7-5 | Kristie Boogert | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kristie Boogert | #564 | #29 | 549 | 1,770 | 104 | 139 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Yayuk Basuki | #262 | #19 | 1,360 | 1,940 | 161 | 123 | 56.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kristie Boogert | Yayuk Basuki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1991 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #168 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1993 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #111 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1994 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #53 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #35 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1995 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #35 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #48 | 1,700 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1996 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #55 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #43 | 1,723 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1997 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #82 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #29 | 1,788 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 1998 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #83 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 1999 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #94 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #30 | 1,853 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2000 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #66 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #20 | 1,854 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2001 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #146 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #56 | 1,727 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2002 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #141 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,707 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #314 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #256 | 1,660 | 0 | 6 |