H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Kristien Shaw vs Eliza Pande H2H: 0-1

Eliza Pande holds a 1–0 lead over Kristien Shaw in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Eliza Pande leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Eliza Pande won the 1971 US Open round of 32 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kristien Shaw
USA Age 74
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Eliza Pande
USA Age 73

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Eliza Pande 6-2 6-4 Kristien Shaw Match data Sep 7, 1971* R32 US Open Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kristien Shaw — — — 1,924 119 141 45.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Eliza Pande — — — 1,848 42 21 66.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kristien Shaw Eliza Pande
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1968 0–2 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 1968 4–3 57.1% — 1,528 0 0
16 1969 5–8 38.5% — 1,514 0 0 1969 5–4 55.6% — 1,569 0 0
17 1970 12–10 54.5% — 1,592 0 1 1970 13–4 76.5% — 1,720 0 2
18 1971 23–25 47.9% — 1,715 0 1 1971 18–7 72.0% — 1,840 0 3
19 1972 2–13 13.3% — 1,623 0 1 1972 1–2 33.3% — 1,788 0 3
20 1973 29–24 54.7% — 1,906 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 1974 10–14 41.7% — 1,811 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 1975 14–14 50.0% — 1,792 0 1 — — — — — — —
23 1976 6–4 60.0% — 1,846 0 1 — — — — — — —
24 1977 17–20 45.9% — 1,834 0 1 — — — — — — —
25 1978 1–7 12.5% — 1,751 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 — — — — — — — 1980 1–1 50.0% — 1,766 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kristien Shaw Eliza Pande
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1968 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1968 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1969 3 4 7 42.9% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1969 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
17 1970 8 4 12 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 1970 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 7 2 9 77.8% — — — —
18 1971 2 4 6 33.3% 0 6 6 0.0% 21 15 36 58.3% — — — — 1971 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 17 6 23 73.9% — — — —
19 1972 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 1972 — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
20 1973 6 6 12 50.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 12 5 17 70.6% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1974 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1975 5 6 11 45.5% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1976 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1977 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 12 12 24 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1978 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 31 42 73 42.5% 18 26 44 40.9% 43 37 80 53.8% 27 35 62 43.5% — 14 7 21 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 26 12 38 68.4% — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kristien Shaw Eliza Pande
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1968 1485 99.9 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 — — -0.41 1968 1528 103.9 — — — — +38 — — 53.3% +0.47 1–0 — — +0.09
16 1969 1515 113.4 — — — — +28 +25 -27 42.3% -0.39 1–1 — — -0.23 1969 1569 114.7 — — — — +89 — -27 52.6% +0.47 1–0 — — +0.57
17 1970 1593 114.0 — — — — +56 — -61 55.3% +0.49 3–2 (60%) — — +2.96 1970 1721 126.8 — — — — +38 — -29 68.4% +1.42 4–0 (100%) — — +1.13
18 1971 1716 133.5 — — — — -75 -249 +83 48.6% -0.28 6–5 (55%) 3–2 (60%) 102.1 -3.43 1971 1841 128.9 — — — — — — +57 61.4% +0.67 8–1 (89%) 0–1 — +0.71
19 1972 1624 116.8 — — — — -39 — +85 25.0% -2.00 1–5 (17%) 1–1 — -2.01 1972 1788 100.2 — — — — — — +25 50.0% +0.25 0–2 — — +0.45
20 1973 1906 155.3 — — — — -158 -300 -12 51.7% +0.41 8–4 (67%) 6–10 (38%) 106.7 -8.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1974 1812 131.9 — — — — -145 — +87 35.4% -1.00 3–3 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — -2.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1975 1792 131.3 — — — — -35 -117 — 49.2% +0.13 3–4 (43%) 2–5 (29%) 97.4 +0.63 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1976 1846 129.0 — — — — -16 -194 — 63.6% +0.77 0–2 0–2 — -1.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1977 1834 142.3 — — — — -45 — +56 43.5% -0.34 8–5 (62%) 3–5 (38%) 101.2 -3.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1978 1752 112.7 — — — — -71 — — 22.2% -1.61 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1767 101.2 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 — 1–1 — +0.03
Career — 1924 142.0 — — — — -62 -212 +44 45.7% -0.23 33–34 (49%) 17–29 (37%) 98.1 -7.85 — 1848 125.3 — — — — +53 — +27 60.3% +0.80 14–3 (82%) 1–2 (33%) 109.3 +4.81

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.