H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Kristina Barrois vs María Emilia Salerni H2H: 1-0
Kristina Barrois holds a 1–0 lead over María Emilia Salerni in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kristina Barrois leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kristina Barrois won the 2009 Roland Garros first round 3-6 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 44
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 43
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2009* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Kristina Barrois | 3-6 6-1 6-2 | María Emilia Salerni | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kristina Barrois | #349 | #57 | 1,066 | 1,699 | 34 | 59 | 36.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| María Emilia Salerni | #328 | #65 | 471 | 1,553 | 30 | 60 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kristina Barrois | María Emilia Salerni | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #122 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #127 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #173 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 7–3 | 70.0% | #115 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #148 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #119 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #87 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #237 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #241 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #330 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2009 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #78 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2010 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #79 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2011 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #91 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2012 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #255 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |